Ian Murray wrote:

>What's even more ridiculous about it the presumption that the 20-30
>something's are obliged to tell their world weary/cynical elders
>something they don't already know, when in fact NH, NK etc. are
>communicating with their peers; the ones who have to try and deal with a
>pathetic mess they didn't make.


----


>Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:16:44 +0200
>From: Drazen Pantic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: nettime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: <nettime> terrific post from slashdot ...
>
>In a discussion about the interview David Bowie gave to
>NYT, [1], Dr. Spork, posted the text with the title "Only
>rebels left are old!", [2] :
>
>Am I the only young person who notices that the only people
>who express their dissent at stupid things in this world
>today are old? This is a terrible sign! I seriously think
>that historians will view this decade as the "era of new
>conformity," sort of like the 50s without the commies.
>I'm serious: Take for example the only people you see
>speaking out in public against the idiotic "War on
>Terror"--they are old! Even academics who find it just as
>stupid as I do keep their mouths shut, even if they have
>tenure.
>The same goes for this "Intellectual Property" debate. I
>would be shocked if there weren't many young artists who
>agree with every word that Bowie says about the
>subject. Still, they keep a low profile and don't rock the
>boat, because we live in a climate where that gets you
>severely punished. I wasn't there, but I suspect in the 60's
>and 70's people faced the same dilemmas, but they said "fuck
>it, I'll say what I think and see what happens." But then
>again, maybe the government and the corporations have us
>under a tighter clamp now than any other time in Western
>history since constitutions started being written.
>Sure, we all have a right to free speech, but the system has
>made it so that speaking freely is severely against our
>interest. This means that even though we won't go to jail,
>we will get fired, spied upon, harassed, and vilified as
>friends of terrorists. (How long will it take before
>somebody argues that abolishing IP laws would be "caving in
>to terrorism"? Surely they will find some stupid, tenuous
>connection.)
>Anyway, this era makes me sick. You people suck. I might as
>well burn my books now to save you the trouble, because when
>these old- school rebels die, nobody will raise their voice
>in protest.
>
>
>         
>[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/09/arts/music/09PARE.html?todaysheadlines
>[2] http://slashdot.org/articles/02/06/09/1354201.shtml?tid=141
>
>#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
>#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
>#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
>#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
>#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to