A Workforce Divided
Rising Use of Temps Is Creating Two Classes of Employees

By Margaret Webb Pressler
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 23, 2002; Page H01


For a few months now, Julie Lenzer Kirk has been in the seemingly
enviable position of having too much work for her small Germantown
company, Applied Creative Technologies, to handle.

But this has also put Kirk in a quandary. She needed someone to do
graphic design and marketing work, but she didn't know whether the
demand would last long enough to justify hiring a new person.
Adding an employee is a big decision for a company with a staff of
just 20, so Kirk did what thousands of business owners across the
country are also doing: She hired a temp.

"I'm not sure if it's just a temporary bubble or a long-term
need," said Kirk, whose company designs software for
manufacturers, such as bar-code systems. She could always lay off
a new employee if the available work dwindled, "but that . . .
really eats into the morale of the company."

Kirk's move is a microcosm of the new world for temporary workers.
No longer limited to secretarial and administrative positions,
temps can be found in just about every sector of the economy --
and all the way up and down the corporate ladder.

Look at the desk next to you, and you may see one. There are
temporary computer programmers, accountants, manufacturing workers
and even executives. And they are being used more and more by all
kinds of companies, from Fortune 500 giants to tiny firms such as
Applied Creative Technologies.

The number of temp workers employed in the United States more than
doubled from 1992 to 2000, despite the strong economy in that
time. In fact, the rising use of temps may be one reason for the
economy's strength, as some economists argue that a significant
temporary workforce allows corporate America to be leaner, more
flexible and more competitive.

There is also some evidence that the use of temporaries may have
kept the recent recession from being even worse. Companies were
quick to let their temps go when growth went south a year ago, and
that reduced costs in a heartbeat. Now businesses are picking them
back up, allowing for a rapid response to improving economic
conditions.

"It's really hard to compete" without temps, said Richard
Wahlquist, president and chief executive of the American Staffing
Association of Alexandria, the temp industry's main trade
association.

Naturally, the change is also having a big impact on the culture
of the workplace, where companies increasingly are dealing with
two classes of employees -- those who work for a company, and
those who merely work at the company. If you think corporate
loyalty is already eroding, just wait.

This dichotomy in the workforce is likely to intensify, as
companies increasingly find it safer to let temps metamorphose
into permanent workers once business conditions (and
personalities) are proven. Experts say more and more job offers
are likely to come structured in this "temp-to-perm" way.

"It's the wave of the future," said Lori DeCesare, president of
Legal Placements Inc. of Washington, which places temporary
lawyers, paralegals and legal secretaries, many on a
temporary-to-permanent status. "A year ago, they'd see one person,
they'd say, 'Oh, that person is fine, let's hire them.'
Definitely, that has changed."

Heady Growth Prospects
The temporary-staffing industry is almost giddy about the
prospects for its long-term business after the dramatic gains of
the past decade. Even though last year was a disaster for the temp
business -- with 360,000 jobs lost -- it's hard to deny the
freight train coming down the tracks. And the recent signs of
growth in the temp business suggest the engine's back on track and
moving.

For the past three months, the number of temporary workers
employed nationwide has grown solidly, according to the Bureau of
Labor Statistics, even as overall job growth has been relatively
anemic. Last month, 25,000 of the 41,000 new jobs added in the
nation's economy went to temps.

It's been a long time coming. At the beginning of the 1990s, most
temps were still filling clerical and administrative positions, as
well as some manufacturing needs. By the end of the decade, about
a fifth of the industry's revenue came from professional
positions.

Last month, there were 2.9 million people working in temp jobs,
according to the BLS, or about 2.5 percent of the employed
workforce of 134.4 million people. Ten years ago, a million temps
accounted for less than 1 percent of all workers.

"I would make an argument that one of the reasons this downturn
has been relatively short-lived is that companies had far more
flexibility, from a cost standpoint, with their largest line-item
expense, their people," said Gary Peck, president of the Spherion
Staffing Group of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., one of the nation's
largest temporary services firms.

The temp business argues, and so do some economists, that the
swelling ranks of temporary workers are the result of more
responsive business models throughout corporate America. For the
past decade, companies from all sectors have invested heavily in
technology to make their operations more efficient. It has become
critical to more closely monitor inventories, sales, billing and
shipments so that services can be delivered according to need
rather than tie up capital in excess capacity that would only be
used up in spurts. The temp industry allows that same strategy to
be employed in a company's workforce: Hire 'em when you need 'em,
and let 'em go when you don't.

"While firms have really concentrated on just-in-time inventory,
the concept of just-in-time workforce makes sense," said Wahlquist
of the trade association. "No one likes to do layoffs. It's bad
for business, bad for morale."

Technology has driven the growth of the temporary industry in
other ways, too. The explosion in Internet, software and
telecommunications companies in the 1990s was tailor-made for the
temp business. Many of these businesses were started on a
shoestring, so temps were a good, cheap source of manpower. Tech
companies also experience big swings in the need for workers as a
product wends its way through the cycle of development, testing
and release, requiring more workers at some times than at others,
which again is a problem easily solved by hiring temps.

Additionally, tech companies are likely to have positions that may
require a particular generic skill -- such as programming -- but
little innate knowledge of a company's strategy and business. That
makes it easier to hire people for short bursts of time.

For all these reasons, the use of temp workers in Silicon Valley
is three times the national average. But now there appears to be
no stopping the trend throughout the economy.

After the recent, and sudden, economic downturn, and with the pace
of the recovery feeling shaky at times even now, businesses are
hedging their bets on new hires. Temporary staffing agencies say
firms are hiring workers for anywhere from three months to a year
before deciding to make a full-time offer.

That's how Kirk of Applied Creative Technologies is approaching
many of her new hires these days, citing the opportunity it gives
her to "test-drive" a worker and gauge the company's long-term
need in the meantime. And more workers are willing to take such
temporary jobs to get into the fields they want, given that jobs
are scarcer now.

April Crews of Alexandria once worked in public relations but
signed up with the local temporary firm Millennium Staffing a year
ago to try to find a job in the media world. It has taken that
long for a job to materialize, but last week Crews started work as
a temp for a major media company in the city (neither she nor her
agency wanted to identify the company). Her job right now is doing
administrative work, but she hopes it will lead to something
better.

"I'm using it to get my foot in the door," said Crews, who's in
her early twenties. "I just like being in the environment of a
media company, and if I'm in the field, then I'm happy."

The fact that Crews finally found a job is another sign of the
building momentum in the temporary business, and it could be a
good sign for the economy as a whole. In previous business cycles,
the temp industry has been a good predictor of where the economy
was heading, both on the way into a recession and on the way out.

"The staffing workforce operates as very effective shock absorbers
to balance out the highs and lows in economic cycles," Wahlquist
said. "It's very, very good for the economy as a whole."

Advantages, Drawbacks
It's hard to sell the notion that the temp explosion is great for
the American worker: Temps may not particularly appreciate being
the economy's shock absorbers. And their growing ranks mean more
employees at U.S. companies with little sense of job security.

Staffing executives are sensitive about the lopsided impact a
downturn can have on their industry, even if it is the first to
recover. Executives argue that temporary workers who are let go
are better off than permanent workers who are let go because they
have the staffing agency to back them up in their hunt for a new
position.

They also cite the growing ranks of temporary workers who do
nothing but jump from temp job to temp job because they like the
flexibility. Indeed, that's easier to do now that temp agencies
almost universally offer their workers the option of buying into a
benefits program for health care and paid vacation.

But Francoise Carre, director of the Radcliffe Public Policy
Center at Harvard University, cites a 1999 study that showed 60
percent of temps would rather have a permanent job. She said the
contentment of temp workers is also variable, depending, logically
enough, on how much demand there is for work -- last year, for
example, was a lousy time to be a temp -- and how long a temp must
stay that way before getting that coveted full-time position.

"Temp workers may see this as a foothold into a workplace,
particularly a good workplace," she said. "But if they're in there
for five years and never get hired, they may get disillusioned."

That issue was at the heart of a long-running and acrimonious
court battle waged throughout the 1990s between Microsoft Corp.
and thousands of temporary workers at the software giant. The case
centered on Microsoft's history of employing what it called
"freelancers" for long periods of time while giving them no
benefits and no access to the kinds of stock options that were
making many regular employees rich.

The plaintiffs' case painted a clear picture of a caste system
with two tiers of employees -- the regular workers who wore blue
badges, and the temporary workers who wore orange badges. Workers
with an orange badge had a separate set of rules to live by on a
daily basis: They could not shop at the company store, use company
athletic fields or even park in the company parking lots. Many of
the plaintiffs worked for Microsoft for years.

In January 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal
by Microsoft, letting stand a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals that the company's temporary workers were
actually common-law employees who deserved the same benefits as
regular employees and the chance to buy discounted stock.

Carre says this kind of two-tier system has also become more
common throughout Silicon Valley, and that may be a cautionary
tale for the rest of the country as it charges ahead into a
"flexible workforce" culture.

For companies looking for such flexibility, the decision may be as
much about the kind of corporate culture they want to create as it
is about the business justifications. Managers may increasingly be
faced with the task of leading two types of workers, the permanent
and the temporary. And co-workers will have to learn to be
sensitive to the subtle differences in status between two
employees who may otherwise be doing the same job.

Sociologists are starting to study the issue more, after seeing
the complicated and demoralizing effect the wide use of temps has
had at some companies in Silicon Valley.

"In those places where you have high-volume, systematic use of
temporaries, then the issue is not only for the temps themselves,
but also the co-workers and the managers," Carre said. "How do you
deal with them when there is a birthday party, or a staff picnic,
or any other reward mechanism you might use for your employees. Do
you include them, or not?"

Or, to put it another way, suppose they created a new economic
boom, and not everybody was invited.


Reply via email to