Patrick Bond:
> More soon on why this is emblematic of the coming
> failure of the Jo'burg World Summit on Sustainable Development. Just heard
>an  excellent talk by Wolfgang Sachs at Wits University this afternoon; his
>edited  "Jo'burg Memo" is quite a good demolition job on the sustainable
>development  blahblah that is doing the rounds here and  everywhere... 

Speaking of "green" flim-flammery:

Deconstructing Conservation International

by irlandesa 

Say Hi to the Masters of the Universe

Conservation International. We know it as that shadowy "NGO" that has been
rather overtly lurking in the Selva Lacandona - and other places - for the
last number of years. We know that it has been "mapping" the countryside,
setting up trendy eco-tourism roosts and "advising" the Lacandón on how to
expel the pesky autonomous [Zapatista] communities by filing criminal
charges against them.

We know that they have deep pockets, that they represent dark interests,
that they have a hidden agenda. But what else do we know? And why would it
be useful to know it?

Everyone has always sensed that CI is not your father's non-profit. No, it
most definitely is not. It is, in fact, ours. Ours in the sense that it is
our reality, it is of our times, and it is ours to deal with. The question
might arise, though, as to why bother. Enough, perhaps, to know that they
are the bad guys, the deeply dangerous ones, and let it go at that. The
danger in NOT deconstructing, in not learning what lies beneath, is that
then, one way or another, we become rather witting pawns. While it is most
essential to have one's own convictions, program, history, playing field
and dreams, it is always imperative to understand the enemy. And make no
mistake. They are the enemy, writ large.

CI at first glance appears to be a fancy-dress version of a well-known
entity: an internationally respected non-profit that functions as a cover
for covert interests. An NGO that can move easily throughout the world,
co-opting, prospecting, infiltrating, claiming. An unobtrusive stalking
horse for governments and capital.

But I would assert that it is much more than that. It is not just a front.
It is, in fact, THE front. The interests it represents are its own, and
those interests are extraordinary. Extraordinary in their depth and breadth
and reach.

Of almost greater importance, though, is the fact that their structure does
indeed reflect, and entail, what seems to be the new organizational
framework for the new omnipotent actor on the global stage. It is a fluid
collection of persons and interests who fancy themselves to be massively
entitled and whose experience has done little to belie that. They do not
defer to anyone, whether governments or financial institutions. They have,
of course, already absorbed those governments and institutions, given them
tasks, made them feel useful.

I would venture that it is organizations like CI which will eventually be
the ones most engaged in administering - if not directly designing - the
projects of global capital. They will do the scouting, the team organizing,
the back-room deals, the demolition work, the profit-reaping. They will do
it in different guises and under varying banners, but they will get the job
done.

In CI's case, the players bring to the table an absolutely mind-shattering
array of skills in making billions of dollars and living to do it again.
They are the adepts, the self-chosen ones, the Masters of the Universe.

Conservation International has a Chairman of the Executive Committee, four
mostly decorative Vice-Chairs and a Board which is comprised of 27 members
and sundry Emeritus Directors. There are, in addition, a number of adjunct
organizations, including the Center for Environmental Leadership in
Business (CELB), the Center for Applied Biodiversity Science (CELB), the
Global Conservation Fund, the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF),
the Conservation Enterprise Fund (CEF) and the Resource Economics Program.
The proliferation of these structures seems to have much to do with
channeling largesse from various donor agencies.

It is the 27 Board members who make one take pause, serious pause, gawking
mouth-agape pause. There are Energy Masters, Money Masters, Telecom
Masters, Agribusiness Masters, Secretive Scary Deal-Maker Masters, Masters
of Miscellany and two lone Philanthropy Mistresses. And there they sit,
controlling almost immeasurable amounts of capital and millions of lives.

Let us say hi to some of them:

There is Stewart A. Resnick, the Co-Chairman and President of The Roll
Corporation. Duh what? Like in Tootsie Rolls, perhaps? Um, not. Like in a
privately held company worth billions and with an annual revenue of $700
million. He and his wife oversee a conglomerate which includes The Franklin
Mint (which Ms. Resnick handles in lieu of, say, hitting the yard sales),
Teleflora and a $200 million agribusiness, including Paramount Farms and
Paramount Citrus, the latter being the largest US grower, packer and
marketer of fresh citrus.

Then there is Judson Green, the President and CEO of Navigations
Technologies Corporation. That's NavTech, you know, the maker of the little
mapping gizmo you get if you luck out when you rent a car. They are the
world's leading developer of digital map information for navigation
systems. Their clients include all the world's major auto manufacturers, as
well as Magellan, Mitsubishi, Panasonic and any one else who might require
"route guidance solutions." Prior to NAVTECH, Green was Chairman of Walt
Disney Attractions, where he presided over bundles of expansion. He also
sits on the board of the World Bank Institute.

Continuing to look skyward, we have Craig O. McCaw, the Chairman and CEO of
Eagle River, Inc. NOT what you are thinking. Having inherited a handy
fortune, he parlayed it into a much handier one in his role as "telecom
visionary," with a cable television and mobile phone empire which he wisely
sold to AT&T. His current claim to fame is his relationship with Teledesic.
He is a primary investor, lending "strategic direction" to this budding
company - along with (hold your breath) Bill Gates, Saudi Prince Alwaleed,
Bin Tajal, the ever-popular Abu Dhabi Investment Company and Boeing. They
plan to put lots and lots of satellites into space in order to provide
high-bandwidth data communications via their network. Their target client
base will be "multinational corporations, governments and other large
enterprises...to support mission-critical data applications." Exactly.

Then there is publicity-shy Nicholas J. Pritzker, the Chairman of the Board
and CEO of Hyatt Development Corporation, who helps guard a $12 billion,
again mostly privately held, family fortune. A dinosaur-bone collecting
vegan, he has been having rocky times of late getting a huge development
project off the ground in Boston. He is also chairman of EOS Biotechnology
Inc., whose mission statement is "leveraging genome information." They have
filed for 75 individual US patents.

Moving to even scarier ground, we have one Oscar M. Lopez, Chairman and CEO
of First Philippine Holding Corporation. This is a massive gas and
electricity conglomerate, handling generation and distribution,
construction, investment and financing holding throughout the Philippines.

Henry H. Arnhold, Co-chair of Arnhold & S. Bleichroeder oversees a natty
little securities "boutique" in New York. They pioneered the whole
international investment gig, and, in elegant summation, this is where
George Soros cut his baby teeth.

Barry Diller - yuck, yes - is Chairman and CEO of USA Networks, Inc., which
now includes Ticketmaster and expedia.com and did $4.7 billion in sales in
2000. He touts himself as the "apostle of the coming age of convergence,"
which in his case means flogging product in LOTS of different places, but
which could also serve as a rallying cry for CI.

Kenneth F. Siebel, Chief Investment Officer for the U.S. Trust Company of
California, N.A., manages $93 billion in assets, which most certainly
explains why HE is always invited to the party.

Peripatetic H. Fisk Johnson is Chairman and Chairman of the Board of S.C.
Johnson & Son, Inc., the guys that make all those domestic household
cleaners, of course. In his spare time he runs Fisk Ventures, Inc., a
private venture capital company which has just entered into a
"groundbreaking" agreement with NASA to develop commercial medical products
using NASA's Bioreactor technology.

We have Joel Korn, currently the president of WKI Brasil Servivios Ltda.
and the American Chamber of Commerce in Rio de Janeiro, and former
President of Bank of America Brazil. William H. Kent, Chairman of the Board
of a massive consulting firm that specializes in international strategy
development for Fortune 500 companies. Seriously. Not to slight Robert J.
Fisher, who resigned as Director of Gap, Inc., in 1999. That is Fisher as
in the $12 billion Fisher family fortune which recently did some major
investing in the Mendocino redwoods and has found itself the subject of
much bad press and feelings over their logging practices.

And there are more, of course.

As a special bonus, though, I would like to introduce to you someone who
does not sit on the CI board, but rather on the Executive Board of CI's
CELB, which you may remember as being their Center for Environmental
Leadership in Business. An apt position for...

Roger W. Sant, Chairman of the AES Corporation (Applied Energy Services),
which happens to be the largest independent power producer in the world,
with assets of $11 billion. Sant, no one's literal fool, is also a
co-founder of World Wildlife Fund. Despite doing his best to clothe his
company in the mantle of environmental correctness, AES has been involved
in a morass of corporate misconduct, ranging from charges of corruption,
opposition to unions, willful deception and even suing local communities
who dare to balk at their plans. Sant has brayed that AES is the biggest
private user of World Bank money, through the IFC. They own plants
throughout Central and South America (including two hydro-electric plants
in Panama), and on January 23, 1997, they led a consortium which signed an
agreement with Mexico's Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) to build, own
and operate Mexico's first "independent" power project in Mérida. This
Board quite blatantly reflects its true nature. The "conservation" cover is
a bonus, "added value" as it were, to a structure which serves many other
purposes. For the Masters, what CI lends them is obvious: intelligence,
access, coordination and - ah! - synergy. If the American Chamber of
Commerce (AmCham) might suffice for the luckless bottom feeders in Mexico
City and Rio, the Masters require something much bigger, better and faster.

It also serves as a valuable means for moving money and technology around.

There is the expected institutional interchange here: many of the Masters
sit on World Bank and IMF boards, or act as advisors. "Donations" comes in
from grantmaking organizations, financial institutions, corporate boards.
Or, on a good day, from all of them at the same time, such as the Critical
Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), which is a consortium of sorts of CI,
the World Bank and the Global Environmental Facility and which received $25
million from the MacArthur Foundation last year (which seems to spread its
largesse everywhere, no?). Technology is also shared between government
agencies and CI and, of course, the corporations. All told, an elegant design.

The symbiotic utility of CI thus provides the Masters with a source for
intelligence and for the forging of shifting alignments or ad hoc
"strategic partnerships" between and among corporate, capital,
institutional and governmental actors.

In addition, its programs on the ground, or "forward positions", allow
these actors all the access they need for surveying, cataloguing,
influencing and claiming, well, whatever it is they want and choose to
survey, catalogue, influence and claim. The manner in which these positions
are chosen, and the amount of time and dollars dedicated to them, can
provide a useful early warning system for those whose own interests might
be involved. Much to the chagrin of the Masters.


Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to