I have resisted several times mentioning Rodrik but his analysis of the impact of globalism (international economic integration) is in many ways far more 'radical' than is Stiglitz's. See his Rodrik trilemma on his web page -- a stimulating and provocative analysis.
Paul Phillips, Economics, University of Manitoba From: "F G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:29730] Rodrik Date sent: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:26:50 -0400 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Since we´ve been discussing dissident "mainstream" economists on the list > recently (Stiglitz, Krguman v. neoliberalism in Lat Am), I thought it was > worth mentioning Dani Rodrik, who surprisingly has yet to be brought up. He > has certainly critiziced global neoliberalism. His book, "The New Global > Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work" (which I´ve read in > Spanish) roundly attacks the idea of liberalization-as-an-end as well as > "export fetishism" and argues that complementary domestic institutions are > needed for succesful international integration. He´s also co-written a > paper critizing the open-trade=growth connection > http://papers.nber.org/papers/w7081. > Some other working papers are up at > >http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/pubwzAuthor?OpenForm&Start=1&Count=1000&Expand=35&Seq=1 > > Comments? > -Frank G. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com >
