Title: RE: [PEN-L:31684] RE: RE: real economics

drumroll, please... it's time to start nominating people for the Nobel Prize in economics....

------------------------
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davies, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:29 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PEN-L:31684] RE: RE: real economics
>
>
> check out the actual paper, it's a beaut.  No use of OLS regression to
> demonstrate "analytical rigour", but two classic traits of the genre:

> 1)  "the best available science" is defined as the contents of Bjorn
> Lomberg's book.  I gave up counting at the 30th citation of Lomborg.

> 2)  the argument appears to be that environmentalists are
> interested in the
> environment, so the environment is one of their interests, so they're
> interested in one of their interests, so they're
> self-interested, so they're
> not *really* interested in the environment.

> I love George Mason University.

> dd


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devine, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 October 2002 16:08
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PEN-L:31683] RE: real economics
>
>
>
> so, if an environmentalist group doesn't follow a hard-core
> neoclassical
> perspective (points 1, 2, & 3 below), it's a "special
> interest group"?
>
> do the George Mason University Law School and Economics
> Department analyze
> themselves in these terms? are they rent-seeking?
>
> ------------------------
> Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> <http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
>
>
> >   This article provides a first effort at testing the
> >   implications of public interest versus private interest models
> >   of environmental interest groups. In particular, it specifies
> >   three testable implications of a public interest model of the
> >   activities of environmental interest groups: (1) a desire to
> >   base policy on the best-available science; (2) a willingness to
> >   engage in deliberation and compromise to balance environmental
> >   protection against other compelling social and economic
> >   interests; and, (3) a willingness to consider alternative
> >   regulatory strategies that can deliver environmental protection
> >   at lower-cost than traditional command-and-control regulation.
> >   On all three counts, it is found that the public-interest or
> >   "civic republican" explanation for the activities of
> >   environmental interest groups fails to convincingly describe
> >   their behavior. On the other hand, the evidence on each of these
> >   three tests is consistent with a self-interested model of the
> >   behavior of environmental interest-groups. Their activities can
> >   be understood as being identical to those of any other interest
> >   group - namely, the desire to use the coercive power of
> >   government to subsidize their personal desires for greater
> >   environmental protection and to redistribute wealth and power to
> >   themselves.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
> Email Disclaimer
>
> This communication may contain confidential or privileged
> information and
> is for the attention of the named recipient only.
> It should not be passed on to any other person.
> Information relating to any company or security, is for
> information purposes
> only and should not be interpreted as a solicitation or offer
> to buy or sell
> any security. The information on which this communication is based has
> been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, but we do not
> guarantee its accuracy or completeness. All expressions of
> opinion are
> subject to change without notice. All e-mail messages, and associated
> attachments, are subject to interception and monitoring for
> lawful business
> purposes. (c) 2002 Cazenove Service Company or affiliates.
>
>
> Cazenove & Co. Ltd and Cazenove Fund Management Limited
> provide independent
> advice and are regulated by the Financial Services Authority
> and members of the
> London Stock Exchange.
>
> Cazenove Fund Management Jersey is a branch of Cazenove Fund
> Management Limited
> and is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission.
>
> Cazenove Investment Fund Management Limited, regulated by the
> Financial Services
> Authority and a member of IMA, promotes only its own products
> and services.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
>
>

Reply via email to