Please tell me that this news is a hoax. Sabri

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Thursday, November 21, 2002
By Major Garrett

Fox News

WASHINGTON — A massive database that the government will use to
monitor every purchase made by every American citizen is a
necessary tool in the war on terror, the Pentagon said Wednesday.

Edward Aldridge, undersecretary of Acquisitions and Technology,
told reporters that the Pentagon is developing a prototype
database to seek "patterns indicative of terrorist activity."
Aldridge said the database would collect and use software to
analyze consumer purchases in hopes of catching terrorists before
it's too late.

"The bottom line is this is an important research project to
determine the feasibility of using certain transactions and
events to discover and respond to terrorists before they act," he
said.

Aldridge said the database, which he called another "tool" in the
war on terror, would look for telltale signs of suspicious
consumer behavior.

Examples he cited were: sudden and large cash withdrawals,
one-way air or rail travel, rental car transactions and purchases
of firearms, chemicals or agents that could be used to produce
biological or chemical weapons.

It would also combine consumer information with visa records,
passports, arrest records or reports of suspicious activity given
to law enforcement or intelligence services.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is home to the
Pentagon's brightest thinkers -- the ones who built the Internet.
DARPA will be in charge of trying to make the system work
technically.

Rear Adm. John Poindexter, former national security adviser to
President Reagan, is developing the database under the Total
Information Awareness Program. Poindexter was convicted on five
counts of misleading Congress and making false statements during
the Iran-Contra investigation. Those convictions were later
overturned, but critics note that his is a dubious resume for
someone entrusted with so sensitive a task.

Aldridge said Poindexter will only "develop the tool, he will not
be exercising the tool." He said Poindexter brought the database
idea to the Pentagon and persuaded Aldridge and others to pursue
it.

"John has a real passion for this project," Aldridge said.

TIAF's office logo is now one eye scanning the globe. The
translation of the Latin motto: knowledge is power. Some say,
possibly too much power. "What this is talking about is making us
a nation of suspects and I am sorry, the United States citizens
should not have to live in fear of their own government and that
is exactly what this is going to turn out to be," said Chuck
Pena, senior defense policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Pena and others say the database is an even greater violation of
privacy rights than Attorney General John Ashcroft's nixed
proposal to turn postal workers and delivery men into government
tipsters. No matter what protections Congress requires, Pena
fears a database big enough and nimble enough to track the entire
nation's spending habits is ripe for abuse.

"I don't think once you put something like this in place, you can
ever create enough checks and balances and oversight," Pena said.

But proponents say big business already has access to most of
this data, but don't do anything with it to fight terrorism.

"I find it somewhat counter intuitive that people are not
concerned that telemarketers and insurance companies can acquire
this data but feel tremendous trepidation if a government
ventures into this arena. To me it just smacks of paranoia," said
David Rivkin, an attorney for Baker & Hostetler LLP.

The database is not yet ready and Aldridge said it will not be
available for several years. Fake consumer data will be used in
development of the database, he said.

When it's ready, Aldridge said individual privacy rights will be
protected. But he could not explain how the data would be
accessed. In some cases, specific warrants would give law
enforcement agencies access, he said. But in other cases the
database might flag suspicious activity absent a specific request
or warrant, and that suspicious activity could well be relayed to
law enforcement or intelligence agencies.

"I don't know what the scope of this is going to be," Aldridge
said. "We are in a war on terrorism. We are trying to find out if
this technology can work."

Article at:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,70992,00.html

Reply via email to