|
Jim D. says: Reductionism here means trying to explain everything
in the Are you looking to get drawn and quartered? (is that having your four limbs tied by ropes to four horses that
get set off in four directions? That
would put a crimp in your day…).
It is also economism, and probably vulgar
materialism. David (M.) Gordon didn’t like this last phrase, by the way.
I forget why, exactly. I thought Marx used it, but maybe not. Jim, you sound
like you fall under what David termed, in his inimitable way, R^2HM (R-squared
HM), or Revised Revised Historical Materialism. That would be something like “last
instance determinism”. That
is when you write long paragraphs why culture, politics, and ideology matter, but
in the last sentence say that ultimately the economy is the deciding factor. Today you have to be R^3 to get drawn and quartered. Then afterward, you R^4. IR^3. WeB^3. Iwuz^3. Now IM^4. WeeMdevo. M@ 4st@er |
Title: FW: base-superstructure model
- FW: base-superstructure model Devine, James
- Re: FW: base-superstructure model Chris Burford
- Re: Re: FW: base-superstructure model Waistline2
- Re: RE: FW: base-superstructure model Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: FW: base-superstructure model Carrol Cox
- RE: base-superstructure model Devine, James
- re: base-superstructure model Devine, James
- Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection... e. ahmet tonak
