On Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:20 PM I wrote:

> as is Michael Savage (a blatant racist and a generally idiotic
> > person).
>
> Not to be confused in that case with "Michael Joseph Savage", the first
New
> Zealand Labour Party Prime Minister in 1935.
>
My comment may be at least partially mistaken. In the latest issue of
Revolution, published by the New Zealand Radical Media Collective (no. 21,
August-October 2003), my friend Philip Ferguson writes:

"[The New Zealand] Labour [Party] was founded in 1916 and very quickly began
campaigning for the "White New Zealand" immigration policy which was being
developed by the Liberal and Reform parties. Labour MPs urged unions to
adopt "White New Zealand" policies and, in the parliamentary debates over
the 1920 Immigration Restriction Act, Labour MP after Labour MP rose to his
feet to declare in favour of a "White New Zealand" and for the rigid
restriction of immigration into New Zealand by people whose skin was not
white. In those days, it was primarily Asians, especially Chinese, whom the
"socialist" Labour Party wanted to keep out." (p. 12-13).

This is an aspect of New Zealand Labourism which I did not study in detail,
but Philip has. I do not know the exact position which Michael Joseph Savage
took on the issue, which I could verify only by looking at the Parliamentary
Hansard. I do know that racist attitudes, policies and institutions as
regards Asian immigration existed already at least in the 1860s in New
Zealand, and were quite common. James McPherson, a New Zealand worker who,
according to Herbert O. Roth's research, wrote to the secretariat of the
First International in London to warn British workers not to come to New
Zealand, because there was a lot of unemployment and low wages in a
recession, also expressed, according to my own research, racist views about
the Chinese. This topic was also researched by a another friend of mine, Dr
Charles Sedgwick, in his Phd thesis in Sociology at the University of
Canterbury.

But what I can say in favour of MJ Savage, is that he was certainly not an
idiotic person, and cultivated Maori reformers, and that many workingclass
people sympathised with him as a sort of benign "father of the people".

Jurriaan

Reply via email to