I attended a lecture this evening at Portland State University by Michael
Dawson who spoke about his book "The Consumer Trap: Big Business Marketing in
American Life" (Univ. of Illinois Press). Michael has developed a very
powerful analysis of the political economy of mass marketing, based in part upon
an examination of (for the most part as yet unexamined) business archives at
Duke University and the Smithsonian Institute, as well as upon the insights of
the monopoly capital school of radical thought developed by Paul Sweezy and
others associated with Monthly Review magazine (MR will soon be publishing a
review of Michael's book).
Through business combination (allowed by new laws which allowed it), large
corporations gained enough market control to put an end to destructive
price competition, greatly increasing their profits. This did not signal
an end to competition, but competition increasingly took the form of the
sales effort. The question became how could the corporations get people to
continuously increase their expenditures on the corporations' products.
High profits gave the corporations the money to systematize (in fact, to
create) their management, to devote funds to figuring out what were the
best ways to organize their enterprises. The key figure in modern
management is Frederick Taylor. We usually think of Taylor in terms of the
reorganization of the workplace so that management can exert maximum control
over the labor process. Taylor used a three-part process to gain this
control: gathering together all of the relevant knowledge of a work
process, utilizing this knowledge to reorganize the labor process under
managerial control, and establishing detailed work orders for workers to carry
out to produce the output.
Taylor's disciples early on figured out that Taylor's principles could be
applied to the selling of the product as well as to its production. It is
Michael Dawson's achievement to show that corporations did just this, to
elucidate how they did it, to tell us what are the social impacts of the
Taylorization of consumption, and to suggest ways in which we might combat this
assault on our freedom.
At the end of the talk, I bought a copy of Michael's book. I plain to
read it soon as that I can gain a full understanding of his ideas, something not
possible from a short lecture. I urge others to buy his book and
study it carefully.
Michael Yates |
- Karl Marx on the role of public debt and taxation in prim... Jurriaan Bendien
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt and taxatio... Carrol Cox
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt and tax... Jurriaan Bendien
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt and... Chris Burford
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt... Jurriaan Bendien
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public... paul phillips
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of pu... Eubulides
- Re: Karl Marx on the role o... MICHAEL YATES
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of pu... Jurriaan Bendien
- Re: Karl Marx on the role o... paul phillips
- Re: Karl Marx on the role o... Jurriaan Bendien
- Re: Karl Marx on the role o... Mike Ballard
- Re: Karl Marx on the role o... k hanly
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt and taxatio... Devine, James
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt and tax... Jurriaan Bendien
- Re: Karl Marx on the role of public debt and taxatio... Devine, James