Soot worse for global warming than thought

22:00 22 December 03

NewScientist.com news service


Soot particles may be twice as bad as the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in contributing to global warming, suggests a new study.

Grains of soot deposited in snow have also caused about one-quarter
of the observed rise in global surface temperature since 1880,
suggests the model by James Hansen and Larissa Nazarenko. The pair
examined how soot particles affect the atmosphere when they darken
snow and ice.

Darkened snow traps more solar energy than pristine snow. The effect
could explain why sea ice and glaciers are melting faster than
expected from the increase in surface temperature alone, says Hansen
of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.

"The effect of soot on snow is unambiguous," he told New Scientist.
"It causes a strong warming effect."

The findings could be good news on climate as soot emissions may be
easier to cut than carbon dioxide. Hansen says technology exists to
more cleanly burn fossil fuels without releasing large quantities of
soot. The "payback" in terms of climate would be faster by cutting
soot than carbon dioxide gas emissions.

But Hansen cautions: "It does not change the need to slow down the
growth rate of carbon dioxide and eventually stabilize the
atmospheric amount."

Incident light

Soot's effects on the atmosphere are complex and not well understood.
The emissions are a combination of black carbon and organic compounds
which have different effects on surface temperatures. Black carbon
causes warming, but the organic compounds cause cooling. The effects
on ice and snow are simple in comparison, but had largely been
overlooked.

Fresh snow reflects more than 90 percent of incident light - both the
organic and black-carbon components of soot increase its absorption.
Local soot concentrations in snow vary widely, but Hansen estimates
that it reduces light reflection by 1.5 percent in the Arctic and by
3 percent over land in the Northern hemisphere.

The extra absorbed energy helps melt snow and ice. This creates
positive feedback - and speeds melting - because wet snow absorbs
more light than dry snow, and liquid water absorbs about 90 percent
of the incident light.

This may also explain another climate puzzle - observations of
earlier springs and melting ice sheets. "There is no way to account
for the rapid retreat of ice globally based only on global warming,"
Hansen says. The link to melting ice is critical because rising sea
level is a key danger posed by global warming.

Hansen stresses greenhouse gases remain the main cause of global
warming. But soot does not stay as long in the atmosphere as carbon
dioxide, and emissions may be easier to control, he says.

Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2237157100
--
----------------------------------------------

BUSHES WILL TREMBLE WHEN KUCINICH IS
NOMINATED BY BOTH THE GREENS AND THE DEMOCRATS.

--------------------------------------------------


END OF THE TRAIL SALOON Alternate Sundays 6-8am GMT (10pm-midnight PDT) http://www.kvmr.org

--------------------------------

"I uke, therefore I am." -- Cool Hand Uke
"I log on, therefore I seem to be." -- Rodd Gnawkin

Visit Cool Hand Uke's Lava Tube:
 http://www.oro.net/~dscanlan

Reply via email to