Just to set the record straight: Excuse me, Louis challenged ME directly. Remember? I posted first the piece about oil prices as an index to the direction of capital. Lou took exception to my dismissal of scarcity.
I responded. Lou responded. I re-responded. Lou re-re-responded etc. If the issue has critical impact to economic analysis, and practical opposition, then why would anyone oppose continued exploration? dms Last for the day. All further responses off-list. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Perelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:02 AM Subject: [PEN-L] communicating on pen-l > David challenged Lou and Lou responded regarding oil. First of all, please do not > challenge people directly on the list. That way, we can avoid flaming [flaring] and > people don't find the need to go on and on with interminable challenge and response > threads. > > Also, David made his case already. Merely heaping on more of the same adds little to > the discussion. > -- > Michael Perelman > Economics Department > California State University > Chico, CA 95929 > > Tel. 530-898-5321 > E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu >
