Nothing worries me more than finding myself
agreeing with others, save the prospect of others actually agreeing with
me. Nevertheless, I find JD's exploration and explication of this issue
very enlightening-- and indeed Marx never completed, even internally, this part
of his work, expressing "ambivalence" as to the make-up and meaning of
overproduction i.e. "under-consumption," "disproportionality,"
"over-accumulation."
And capital certainly "deviates" or "manifests" the
abstract in "imperfect," attenuated, distorted, real
forms.
Still, the centrality of this conflict between the
abstract "means and relations" gives the clearest method and insight into
actual analyses of the grim and grimey real forms, i.e the struggle of
revolution and counterrevolution; property and labor.
dms
|
- Picking up the thread.... dmschanoes
- Question for you econ types out there "Chris Doss"
- Re: Picking up the thread.... Devine, James
- dmschanoes