Drug costs will rise with deal: US official

http://www.smh.com.au/text/articles/2004/03/10/1078594434762.html

Date: March 11 2004

By John Garnaut, Sydney Morning Herald

The US trade deal is the first step in a campaign to raise global
pharmaceutical prices, a US Senate finance committee heard yesterday.

Contradicting the Prime Minister, John Howard, America's top trade official
told the committee that the cost of Australian drugs would be changed under
the agreement.

It would change the "distribution" of prices in Australia and the relative
prices of generic and patented drugs, the US Trade Representative, Bob
Zoellick, said.

Under intense pressure on rising drug costs at home, an influential
Republican senator told the committee that the Australian deal was a
"breakthrough" that began the process of getting other countries to bear a
greater share of drug company research and development costs.

"One of the ways of addressing the causes [of high US prices] is to get the
other countries of the world to help bear part of the burden of the R&D,"
said Senator Jon Kyl, who lobbied Australian ministers on the Pharmaceutical
Benefits Scheme last year. "So, my hat's off to your [Mr Zoellick's] team
and the work that you did in at least beginning to address this with
Australia."

Senator Kyl said the final agreement, released last week, was only the
beginning of negotiations over Australia's pharmaceuticals system.

"We don't need to discuss it here, but I know that there is much more work
that needs to be done in further discussions with the Australians."

Labor's health spokeswoman, Julia Gillard, said the deal had set in train a
process that could threaten the PBS. "This is the thin end of the wedge in
an American drug company campaign to impose global drug prices on Australian
patients and taxpayers."

Mr Howard said recently there would be "certainly no direct or indirect
effect on price" and the Health Minister, Tony Abbott, and Trade Minister,
Mark Vaile, have made similar claims.

"Who's lying here, Ambassador Zoellick or John Howard and Tony Abbott?" Ms
Gillard said.

A spokesman for Mr Vaile rejected the US suggestion that Australia did not
carry its share of research and development costs and reiterated that
nothing in the agreement would affect pharmaceutical prices. "Regardless of
the language used by officials in the US it won't change what's been agreed
in this free trade agreement, the full text of which is available for all to
see."

Mr Zoellick told the committee he had protected American beef and dairy
interests from Australian competition."In beef, we had a very long phase-out
with various safeguards, slow quota increase. We tried to take care of the
dairy industry as well because we didn't touch the tariff and we just
increased the quota basically about $40-$50 million of imports a year."

US Democrat Senator Max Baucus said that Mr Zoellick's trade agenda had been
"hijacked" by foreign policy objectives.

Reply via email to