Bush actually said that he apologised to the King of Jordan for the torture of Iraqis by US personnel. Why didn't he directly apologise to the Iraqi people and the victims and their families? Why this strange and roundabout way of going about the act of apology. Why should be he be apologising to the King of Jordan rather than to the Iraqis concerned! First, he refuses to apologise at all and now he apologises second hand through an apology to the King of Jordan. Weird. Is there a third instalment?
Cheers, Ken Hanly
