Of course many jails will also be still under US control including Abu
Ghraib. The interim govt. itself was chosen by the UN and vetted by US. The
government is not to make laws but to be a caretaker. The laws are those
passed by the occupation authorities including a recent law that gives US
troops and contractors immunity from Iraq law, although there is dispute
about how wide the exclusion will extend. Final say on security issues rests
with US commanded multinational fig-leaf forces. The CPA is rushing to award
all sorts of contracts that will bind new govt. once "sovereignty" is handed
over to Iraqis.TheUS and its minions will continue to be kings of Saddam's
castle. The US just recently noted that the new Iraq govt. will not be able
to impose martial law.Only the US multinational force has authority to do
that.

Cheers, Ken Hanly

Iraq's air and sea ports to stay under foreign control
By Nicolas Pelham
Published: June 24 2004 5:00 | Last Updated: June 24 2004 5:00

Iraq's air and sea ports will remain under foreign security control despite
a formal transfer of sovereignty on June 30 to the interim government,
according to coalition officials and security companies.


In the dying weeks of its rule, the occupation administration says it is
issuing contracts worth tens of millions of dollars to British security
contractors in an effort to prolong foreign oversight of strategic ports
that are vital to the US-led reconstruction effort.

"We hired a private contractor to train Iraqis and train themselves out of a
job," says one of 16 coalition advisers at the transport ministry who will
remain after June 30.

Responsibility for security at the sea port of Umm Qasr has been awarded to
the British company Olive.

The coalition administration has also awarded Stevedoring Services of
America a three-month contract to handle the administration and collection
of revenue at the port, says SSA's John Walsh.

An American company, Skylink, will continue to oversee air-traffic control
at Baghdad airport at least until the end of September.

Last-minute manoeuvring to keep a tight rein on security illustrates the
coalition's nervousness at the transfer of power over strategic assets to
Iraqis.

Iraqi officials who had hoped the airport would return to Iraqi hands have
voiced frustration at this month's United Nations resolution binding them to
uphold the contracts awarded from the Development Fund of Iraq, the deposit
for Iraq's oil revenues which the US-led administration is using to pay
contractors.

"I prefer my people to secure the airport. It's a matter of sovereignty,"
says Louay al-Erris, Iraq's newly appointed transport minister. "I don't
think foreigners are more capable than Iraqi police and security."

Iraqi officials have repeatedly alleged that military use of Baghdad
International Airport (BIAP), has hampered its opening to commercial
passenger traffic.

Pent-up demand for travel in a country isolated by 25 years of sanctions and
war is intense. While 500 aircraft land at BIAP daily, all but 50 are
military craft.

Coalition officials respond that they have gone out of their way to prepare
BIAP for the handover. BIAP has been the largest American base in Iraq
during the 16-month occupation, and the relocation of 15,000 troops to two
adjacent camps, say US officials, amounts to a big concession.

"The coalition is making a sacrifice to give that airport back to Iraq,"
says the transport adviser, who adds that he has persuaded US military
commanders they would still have access to Iraq's 160 other airfields.

According to his plan, the ministry of transport would regain control of
BIAP's eastern runway and terminals on July 1 and the western military
runway by mid-August. He said he foresaw security contractors and Iraqi
police working side by side. It remained unclear, he said, who would decide
whether to lift the ban on Iraqi taxis entering the airport perimeter, for
fear they were booby-trapped.

But the security contractor at BIAP, Custerbattles, says its word on access
to the airport remains final. "We have the final say and the legal liability
and that will carry over into the next contract," says Don Ritchie,
programme manager for Custerbattles. But he added: "If I was the Iraqi
general in charge, I'd be upset because there's a security company doing
things I think I should be doing."

Iraqi officials also resent the contractors' recourse to foreign guards,
viewing the presence of Nepalese, South African and British private security
forces as an extension of the occupation.

Bahnam Boulos, Iraq's former transport minister, who was replaced with the
appointment of a new government on June 1, is sceptical of American US
assurances that the security contracts will be short term.

* A strike by US forces that destroyed a house in the Iraqi city of Falluja
overnight killed about 20 foreign fighters, a senior military official said
on Wednesday.Reuters reports from Baghdad.

The US military says the strike targeted a safe house used by militants
loyal to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, accused of links to al-Qaeda. Iraqis said the
attack had killed four Falluja residents.

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1087373231181

Reply via email to