On Dec 8, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
Annual rate of decline in union density by presidential term:
Reagan -3.3%
Clinton -2.1%
Bush -1.6%
is that Bush II? could it be that union density has hit close to rock
bottom, so that even the most anti-union President has a hard time
lowering it further?
Could be. Could also mean that the apparent slowdown under Clinton was
just part of a declining trend, because it slows as it approaches 0.
I'm guessing the UAW will exist mostly in name only pretty soon.
Doug
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
