Apologies. I prematurely sent a long stream-of-consciousness reply to ravi's objections to my post. As I re-read it, I don't make it very clear how I respond to his arguments. Unfortunately, I can't improve on that now.
Re. Michael Smith's complain about the puerility of our discussions here: Fortunately, he has a terrific opportunity to elevate the level of our discussions. He can lead us by example. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
