The Value of (Not Having) the Public Plan
By Arindrajit Dube
http://baselinescenario.com/2009/07/31/the-value-of-not-having-the-public-plan/
...
Here is how the share prices of three major insurance companies
(Cigna, United Healthcare Group, Aetna) responded on Tuesday, July 28
to the Monday night announcement that the group of six senators is
going to eliminate the public option from their version of the health
care reform legislation [graph produced using Yahoo Finance]. We have
basically an 8-10 percent gain for these companies from the Senate
announcement. And as the graph below shows, the S&P 500 index (yellow)
was essentially flat. The market caps of these three companies
together are around $53 billion, which suggests a $4-5 billion value
from the announcement by the group of 6.

Since the change (due to the announcement) in the perceived
probability of the public plan being instituted was less than 1 (i.e.,
it went from a middling number to a small number, as opposed to from a
certain yes to a certain no), this is a lower bound estimate of the
value to the insurers of protection from public sector competition –
whatever the broader societal costs/benefits may be.

To get an estimate of the full value to insurance companies from
killing the public option, we can use Intrade prediction markets to
infer the unanticipated component of the Senate group of 6
announcement.

It appears that after the group of 6 announcement on July 28, the
share price of the Intrade contract, “A federal government run health
insurance plan to be approved before midnight ET 31 Dec 2009,” fell
from around 45 to around 30, a roughly 15 point drop. This suggests
the true value to these insurance companies of not having a public
option may be around 6.7 (=1/.15) times the $4-5 billion change due to
the announcement, or around $28-35 billion dollars.

One can also use the prediction market more systematically to see how
changes in the perceived odds of enactment of a public plan correlate
with stock price returns for these three companies. Regression
analysis confirms the qualitative findings from the event study
analysis above, though the dollar value from protection is found to be
more in the range of $10 billion. Below, I use the full set of daily
Intrade (prediction market) data, available from June 10 when the
contract originated. I also use daily closing stock price data for
these three companies to construct “abnormal returns” (i.e., Raw
Return – “beta” x S&P500 Return, where the market “beta” is taken from
the Google Finance website). I then plot the (market cap weighted)
mean “abnormal returns” against changes in the price of the Intrade
contract.

The correlation coefficient is -0.33, and the slope of the regression
line is -0.21 (standard error of 0.11). This suggests that a 10
percentage point increase in the probability of the public plan
passing is associated with a 2 percent drop in the price of in the
stocks, and this is statistically significant at the 10 percent
confidence level. If we are willing to extrapolate this, it would
suggest an $11 billion (0.2 x $53 billion) gain for these companies
from warding off a public option.
...

-- 
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to