Doug Henwood wrote:
> Why is this guy getting reappointed? He let the bubble inflate,
> dismissed worries about the dangers of subprime "mortgages and
> derivatives, said in mid-2008 that the recession was unlikely to get
> too serious (just as it was about to get very serious)—and then, when
> everything fell apart, set about writing big big big giant big checks
> to Wall Street. Yes, in a financial crisis, it’s essential that a
> central bank flood the system with money to keep things from imploding
> utterly. But he’s done so without any clear strategy or
> accountability, and absolutely no commitment to insuring that it
> doesn’t happen again. Truly the American ruling class is a rotting
> social formation.

Bernanke in effect helped to cause the crisis (by allowing the bubble
to go while) but then he's really good at using his knowledge of the
Great Depression to prevent a new one from happening again (to the
extent that he can). Besides he can keep the financiers calm because
he's part of their club, complete with their antagonism toward Social
Security and Medicare.  And, besides, who would replace Bernanke?[*]
So we might say that even though he's bad, we need him.

Of course, it's the same with the financial system: they got us into
trouble by pumping up the bubble with credit, increasingly deranged
derivatives, and various bizarre mortgage scams for the lower middle
class and upper poor. But we need them, since if we didn't throw money
at them last year, the whole US economy would have went kerplooey.
They were bad, but we need them.

This is how power works: those with power in society make themselves
necessary. The capitalist class was created via a long process of
violence against working people (primitive accumulation) and have
accumulated wealth by exploiting them, too. But we need to keep them
because it we don't, the economy would go south very quickly.
(especially since there's no mass working-class movement to take over
the reins.)

on a related subject: a colleague said something like the following to
me recently: "on this whole issue of income inequality, would the
increases be so bad if we took out the CEOs?"

my response: "that would be a good idea."
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.

[*] alas, I'm not available.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to