On Wed, July 21, 2010 4:19 pm, Max Sawicky wrote: > The Guinier thing was worse because she stood for an intellectual and > policy > approach to dealing substantively with voting rights and discrimination. > Clinton trashed what she stood for, as well as her.
Why, I wonder, does one have to be worse than the other? Isn't it all, all of a piece throughout? What Democrats Do, you might say. -- Michael J. Smith [email protected] http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com http://cars-suck.org "Everyone has his favorite passage from the Theodosian Code." -- M I Finley _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
