New York TIMES / July 26, 2010

Nuclear Energy Loses Cost Advantage

By DIANA S. POWERS

PARIS — Solar photovoltaic systems have long been painted as a clean
way to generate electricity, but expensive compared with other
alternatives to oil, like nuclear power. No longer. In a “historic
crossover,” the costs of solar photovoltaic systems have declined to
the point where they are lower than the rising projected costs of new
nuclear plants, according to a paper published this month.

“Solar photovoltaics have joined the ranks of lower-cost alternatives
to new nuclear plants,” John O. Blackburn, a professor of economics at
Duke University, in North Carolina, and Sam Cunningham, a graduate
student, wrote in the paper, “Solar and Nuclear Costs — The Historic
Crossover.”

This crossover occurred at 16 cents per kilowatt hour, they said.

While solar power costs have been declining, the costs of nuclear
power have been rising inexorably over the past eight years, said Mark
Cooper, senior fellow for economic analysis at the University of
Vermont Law School’s Institute for Energy and Environment.

Estimates of construction costs — about $3 billion per reactor in 2002
— have been regularly revised upward to an average of about $10
billion per reactor, and the estimates are likely to keep rising, said
Mr. Cooper, an analyst specializing in tracking nuclear power costs.

Identifying the real costs of competing energy technologies is
complicated by the wide range of subsidies and tax breaks involved. As
a result, U.S. taxpayers and utility users could end up spending
hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars more than necessary to
achieve an ample low-carbon energy supply, if legislative proposals
before the U.S. Congress lead to adoption of an ambitious nuclear
development program, Mr. Cooper said in a report last November.

The report, “All Risk, No Reward for Taxpayers and Ratepayers,” was a
response to a legislative wish list developed by the Nuclear Energy
Institute, an industry group. The institute has called for a mix of
U.S. subsidies, tax credits, loan guarantees, procedural
simplifications and institutional support on a large scale.

[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/27/business/global/27iht-renuke.html]
-- 
Jim Devine
"All science would be superfluous if the form of appearance of things
directly coincided with their essence." -- KM
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to