http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/aug/29/my-bright-idea-ha-joon-chang

So Chang does not take Clay Shirky very seriously who sees the
transformation in the mode of communication especially in regards to
politics
as transformative. But Shirky's case seems really overblown. Gotta love
though how Chang puts the transformation of women's lives at the center
of the story, though I don't see why he does not consider bottle feeding and
the pill also to be technologies.  Had to order his new book
from amazon uk.

Had a chance to look over Sweezy's Theory of Capitalist Development for the
first time in a long time. Interesting that he defends Marx's
relative neglect of demand on two grounds: first the distribution of income
has to be determined before the effects of demand
can be determined and second changes in the structure of the production are
overwhelmingly the result of supply side dynamics
(he quotes Schumpeter here).

Sweezy insists on looking at Marx in general equilibrium terms, so does not
do a good job undercutting its static implications as does
II Rubin who uses Marshall's partial equilibrium S and D exercises to
undermine them from within.

All that said, Sweezy  provides a wonderful analysis of the price mechanism
in terms of its regulation of exchange ratios, quantities
produced and the interbranch allocation of social labor. He even does a
better job of showing how abstract labor becomes a practical reality
and that this qualitative sociological analysis underpins the entire
analysis.

But most of all I loved the introduction to the book. Here he criticizes the
analysis of the wage and labor's subsistence generally as universally best
understood
in marginal productivity terms. He shows how such analysis obfuscates the
qualitative difference in labor arrangements across space and time.
Not a bad place to start in my opinion.

But boy oh boy is the criticism of Grossman poorly executed.

Yours, Lakshmi
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to