Well, the question is what you care about more: preserving political
purity among a small group of people who are nowhere close to the
numbers needed to effect change, or trying to expand the number of
people involved, even at the cost of sacrificing political purity.
Obviously, this is a question about which you and I fundamentally
disagree, and I see no prospect of compromise. The good news is that
neither of us needs the other's permission to proceed with what we are
doing.

Meanwhile, here is a striking fact. There is an existing consumer
boycott of Ahava cosmetics. This is a slam dunk whether you are a
one-stater or a two-stater. Ahava's main manufacturing plant is
located in an illegal settlement in the West Bank, and its practice of
excavating mud from the shores of the Dead Sea in the West Bank for
use in its products is against international law.

http://www.stolenbeauty.org/

So, I'm wondering if PEN-Lers might be willing to help with a
distributed research question: are Ahava cosmetics sold in your town?
If so, where?


On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Joseph Catron <[email protected]> wrote:
> "[T]aking concrete action" for what? At some point political principles -
> like the difference between ending ethnocratic rule and preserving it -
> matter. There's nothing virtuous about action in and of itself.
>
> Beinart's proposal aims, in his won words, to preempt "the right of millions
> of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes — an agenda that, if
> fulfilled, could dismantle Israel as a Jewish state," he ominously warns.
>
> Those who support his strategy and its avowed goals place themselves in flat
> opposition to Palestinian rights and collective aspirations and, in fact, in
> open support of an objectively racist program.
>
> The more things change, the more they stay the same. "I love [Palestinian
> refugees], as long as they don't move next door ..."
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u52Oz-54VYw
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Robert Naiman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm less interested in whether Beinart passes a political purity test
>> than in whether his advocacy leads more Jews to consider taking
>> concrete action. If one member of one synagogue takes one action to
>> put the idea of boycotting Ahava cosmetics in front of their community
>> as a result of Beinart's advocacy, I would consider that a net plus.
>
>
> --
> "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen
> lytlað."
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to