In case all my preemptive clauses are not read, let me insist:

I'm not talking *probability* here, but *possibility*.

I object to accepting the premise of the Keynesians of the state as a
some sort of deux ex machina without anything anchoring it to the
social ground.  Because a lot of economic and political ideology gets
smuggled that way.  That is all.

One doesn't need to be a conspiracy junkie or an anarchist (with all
due respect) to entertain these scenarios.  History provides plenty of
pabulum.

Back to my cave.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to