Let's assume that Koch and the unions spent an equal amount saturating the airwaves getting our their message to the voters, so they equally got out their respective messages. What was the message that the voters would have received from the unions that they did not actually receive in the actual campaign? What message would have convinced more voters that it was in their self-interest to transfer more of their money to their neighbors who were government employees?
David Shemano -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Louis Proyect Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:49 PM To: Progressive Economics Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Wisconsin On 6/6/12 6:42 PM, David Shemano wrote: > Why do you says they chose "corporate interests" instead of their own > self-interests? As Mr. Rhone stated, I assume most people who voted > for Walker saw themselves as part of the "tax-paying" class as opposed > to the "tax-receiving" class, at least with respect to government > employee benefits, so Walker's actions aligned with their > self-interest. You make it sound like the debate club at Princeton. Instead what happened is Koch millions paid for a tsunami of television ads. We don't have democracy. We have dollarocracy. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
