But the Skidelsky's, like JS Mill before them, seem surprised that the most
effective means devised for reducing work time become, inexplicably, the
most unfailing means for extending and intensifying the work day. But Marx
already answered this paradox raised by JS Mill. By means of the
introduction of new machinery an industrial capitalist can reduce unit
costs and get a leg up on his competitors. But at the same time the
machinery may suffer moral depreciation before it is amortized. Hence the
machine which allows  for the same level of production to be attained with
less overall (indirect and direct) labor time actually demands its non-stop
utilization and thus becomes the most unfailing means for extending and
intensifying the working day. But here the explanation for the social
failure to translate machine production into reduced worker hours overall
is rooted in the social relations of capitalist production, not the
insatiability of the consumer. Only the enforced stupidity of bourgeois
ideology explains why the Skidelsky's would not even entertain Marx's
answer to JS Mill.  Moreover, as the social relations of production
require that industrialists reduce unit costs, but this requires increasing
the scale of production. Which in turn requires the psycho-technics of
advertising to dispose of the increasing accumulation of commodities.
Limiting advertising works at the level of symptom, not in terms of
underlying cause. But again humanist neo-classical ideology based on the
putative sovereignty of the consumer explains why the Skidelsky's would
account for the increasing accumulation of commodities in terms of consumer
wants which are in fact shaped by the social relations of production. One
cannot begin the explanation with the human psychology of the consumer; it
begins with the social relations of production. Sociology has primacy over
psychology. Even Karl Popper accepted this aspect of the Marxist research
program. How many steps back will the Skidelskys take us?
LR
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to