me:
> "The Marxian story goes from actual profit rates to expected profit
> rates to accumulation to aggregate demand. This means that in the
> first part of the story sketched in the previous paragraph, we might
> see expected profit rates rising, boosting actual profit-rate
> realization, which helps raise expected profit rates. This is sort of
> like a Keynesian multiplier/accelerator process, but it cannot
> continue in the second part of the story."

Lakshmi Rhone wrote:
> But isn't this the real story:  from declining profits on marginal (real)
> investments to speculation and bubbles (abetted by the Fed) to higher
> expected profit rates to higher debt-financed expenditures to higher actual
> profit rates until the bubble pops.

I was saying the quasi-Keynesian multiplier/accelerator process that I
described above was limited by supply constraints in the short run.
But I don't think that the US has seriously hit those constraints
recently. (The exception is with oil supplies, but hitting those helps
the profit rates in the oil-producing sector.) Those supply
constraints were crucial during the Great Exception of the 1950s and
1960s, during which US capitalism was operating in a "strong-labor"
economy (bolstered by what Jim O'Connor called the warfare/welfare
state). This political economy encouraged falling profit rates (from
their 1960s peak) and stagflation during the 1970s.

During the 1970s, the US moved to being a "weak-labor" regime. In that
case, capitalist accumulation has been self-feeding in the
quasi-Keynesian way: rising accumulation has realized more profits,
which then encourages more accumulation _even though_ consumption has
been generally stagnant. The latter implies an undertow that has
slowed GDP growth. With limits on real growth (and profitability
there) being hit, accumulation has become increasingly financialized,
involving debt-financed private expenditures, speculation, and
bubbles.
-- 
Jim Devine / "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they
are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to
reality." -- Albert Einstein
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to