I would say that recent work on the collapse of the Harappan civilization
seems to point to ecological not institutional factors, a la A & R.
When one looks at the greatness that this civilization achieved, one is
reminded that social and technological progress, benefiting the vast
majority,
 do not result only from the inclusive institutions of capitalist property
relations and bourgeois democracy.. But this is the message that one gets
from A&R
(I also wonder whether such a message is implicit in Brenner's
institutional analysis of the differences between pre-capitalist and
capitalist social relations
in his contribution to Analytical Marxism. ed. Roemer, a finer example of
the the analysis of the logic of institutions than what A &R offer).
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to