Let's try an analogy. During WW2 a writer might have 'criticized' Churchill
or Roosevelt or Marshall, but would NOT have 'criticized' Tojo or Hitler or
Count Ciano. One does NOT _criticize_ the enemy; one rather comments on
tactics and strategies to mobilize resistance to The Enemy. 

Now the reason that every so often I jump on posts with subject lines such
as " Obama's Second Term Agenda: Cutting Social Security, Medicare, and/or
Medicaid" is that from a socialist or anti-capitalist perspective, such a
subject line is exactly parallel to the following hypothetical headline in a
NYTimes in (say) July 1942: "Hitler plans to capture the Oil Fieleds of the
Ukraine." No kidding! It doesn't really make any difference whatever what
Obama plans to do in his second term: we _know_ (without further evidence)
that he plans to do things that will strengthen capital and weaken the
working class. That is a given. So what the hell is the point of proclaiming
on a supposedly "left" list that Obama is going to attack social security.
Gee whiz. Who wudda thunk it.

Carrol

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Louis Proyect
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 7:27 AM
To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition; PEN-L list
Subject: [Pen-l] Obama's Second Term Agenda: Cutting Social Security,
Medicare, and/or Medicaid

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/07/obamas-second-term-agenda-cutting-soc
ial-security-medicare-andor-medicaid.html
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to