From: Marv Gandall


What does hate or love have to do with it?

^^^^
CB: It's slang. I suppose I can't expect you to get the sense of it.
"Haters" is rap slang for enviers. That's not completely precise
either, but you have been on this list and LBO-talk long enough to
know what I mean when I criticize the ultra-left anti-Obama position
which over time seems pretty clearly to be in part personal dislike of
Obama.

^^^^^
 Like the scorpion in Aesop's fable, Obama is doing what you would
expect: discharging his responsibilities as President of an imperial
power. Liberals are embittered because their expectations were
different. If Hagel is named Defence Secretary, he'll similarly be
compelled to adhere to the prevailing set of "destructive bipartisan
orthodoxies" until America's strategic interests, rather than any
maverick views which he may hold, dictate otherwise.

^^^^^
CB: So, you go off on a dodging tangent, too. In the given balance of
forces in the Reaganite era, and pro-Israel super hegemony in
especially the Senate, this is a vary liberal move to by Obama, and
you can't avoid it or hide with.  Amazing how you can't admit that
this is clearly a leftward signal , as much of a move away from
"destructive bipartisan orthodoxies" as one could expect to get now.
Obama will be running foreign policy , not Hagel. Duhh. This is a way
for Obama to signal a move away from absolute pro-Israeli foreign
policy

^^^^

The continuity of US foreign policy under Obama, particularly with
respect to the Israel-Palestine conflict, is a pretty clear
illustration of the subordination of the individual to systemic
imperatives, even at the very highest level. Obama assumed office with
some sympathy for the Palestinians and the intention to impose a peace
settlement on the Israelis before he was was forced to beat a
humiliating retreat.

^^^^
CB: This appointment is a very clear _break_ with that continuity.
You're talking like Obama didn't just appoint someone who background
is not in sinc with the bi-partisn thingy on Israel.  Hagel is exactly
a signal of discontinuity. He's one of the few people he could appoint
to give such a signal.

^^^^

Perhaps his second term will be different, but that will depend less
on the good intentions and understanding of Obama or Hegel than on a
revised consensus within the US foreign policy and military
establishment, shared by a congressional majority, about the US's
strategic Mideast needs in light of such factors as the Arab Spring,
US economic constraints, shale gas exploitation, and Iran's nuclear
weapons program.

^^^^^
CB: To the extent that Obama can move left in this area this is a
clearcut left move. And the President has more power than the Congress
on foreign policy and defense than the Congress. This is a case where
Obama's good intentions are not just that of another individual , but
the most powerful official in the area.  Also, the Senate will have to
confirm, so, if Hagel gets in, it will be more than Obama moving this
way.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to