On Jun 13, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Morgan, Rothschild, Rockefeller? wouldn't "Murdoch" -- or something > else, such as "corporate" -- be a better term Not if one is referring to the manipulators of the media. Murdoch is an owner/publisher with an attitude. The banksters go much deeper, at least to the early days of Edward Bernays, their clandestine takeover of the nation's money in 1913, their insertion of "making the world safe for democracy" and "the war to end all wars" in the national conversation to enter WWI. And let's not forget the Princeton Radio Project, funded by Rockefeller that produced Orson Wells' War of the Worlds broadcast, an experiment foisted on the American public and studied to understand the mechanics of using radio for popular panic and manipulation. Rockefeller and his various "philanthropic" organizations were the only ones allowed to see the study (until recently). I've mentioned Nelson Rockefeller's use of "the mice" before when referring to voters. Chomsky and others call the process manufacturing consent. The banksters started the process long ago. Murdoch is just good at implementing it in today's world. Who actually owns the five companies that control the news and entertainment media (another, more subtle manipulation outlet than "news")? Banksters. Dan _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
