raghu writes:
>... I don't buy the idea that the Iran war-mongering is driven by 
>considerations of capitalist class-interest....

The war against Iraq served some interest groups better than it did
others, thus spawning the controversy between the unilateralists
(Cheney, etc.) and the multilateralists (Obama, etc.) within the power
elite.

The idea of "capitalist class interest" needs to be clarified. The
_objective_ interests of the capitalist class as a whole (on a world
scale) involves reproducing and expanding the system over time while
allowing the highest sustainable profit rate. This differs from the
objective interests of U.S. capitalism, etc.  The conditions allowing
the attainment of this kind of collective goal are unknown (especially
given the uncertainty inherent in all decisions involving the future),
though various think-tanks propose different ways to attain it,
usually describing the objective capitalist class interest as the
"public interest." On the other hand, the _expressed_ capitalist class
interest is more a matter of different capitalist interest groups
competing in the political arena. (In practice, I think that the
pluralist vision of politics works pretty well, though pluralists
ignore the systematic biases toward serving expressed capitalist
interests.)

In this light, the multilateralists in effect argued that the policies
pushed by Cheney _et al_ were bad in terms of objective capitalist
class interests.  Cheney, on the other hand, was representing a
coalition of pro-Israel forces, the "we've got to control the oil"
bloc, the "US should rule the world and punish deviants such as
Saddam" bloc, and the like.  (This list is not necessarily in order of
importance.)
--
Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to