I'm not an expert on this Napoleon's work and the controversies about it the way Louis is, but there's one thing that's come up very clearly in reading reviews of his recent book: it's amazing how some people (the reviewer in the NY TIMES science section a month or two ago, for example) seem to jump to attention to support him because he claims to be "scientific" and reject his opponents because he claims that they are not "scientific." But his work, as far as I can tell, isn't scientific at all.
-- Jim Devine / "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
