I usually love the work of Thomas Frank, but I am unsure what to make of
this.

Towards the end we see this paragraph that no progressive could disagree
with:

> What ought to happen is that everything I’ve described so far should be
> put in reverse. College should become free or very cheap. It should be
> heavily subsidized by the states, and robust competition from excellent
> state U’s should in turn bring down the price of college across the board.
> Pointless money-drains like a vast administration, a preening president,
> and a quasi-professional football team should all be plugged up.
> Accrediting agencies should come down like a hammer on universities that
> use too many adjuncts and part-time teachers. Student loan debt should be
> universally refinanced to carry little or no interest and should be
> dischargeable in bankruptcy, like any other form of debt.




But try to reconcile that with this piece of vitriol that comes earlier on:

> Colleges and universities clamor greedily these days for pharmaceutical
> patents and ownership chunks of high-tech startups; they boast of being
> “entrepreneurial”; they have rationalized and outsourced countless aspects
> of their operations in the search for cash; they fight their workers nearly
> as ferociously as a nineteenth-century railroad baron; and the richest
> among them have turned their endowments into in-house hedge funds.



Now, consider the seventeen-year-old customer against whom this predatory
> institution squares off.
>


He seems to hate college as an institutions with the passion of a jilted
lover that we sometimes hear from certain PEN-Lers.


http://thebaffler.com/past/academy_fight_song



-raghu.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to