(Note: this is reposted from the NYT op-ed page)
On Nov 16, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Shane Mage wrote:
Zhao Zhong, a former nuclear engineer at the Chinese Academy of
Sciences, is the China program coordinator at Pacific Environment,
an environmental group.
I agree that we should move away from our dependence on greenhouse
gas-emitting fossil fuels at a faster pace and find replacements for
our energy needs at magnitudes much greater than current expectations.
Championing one technology, though, is a distraction. There’s little
to be gained in engaging folks in a “solar versus nuclear” battle.
The single most important thing we must do is place a high price, or
a strict cap, on carbon emissions to make fossil fuel energy less
attractive when compared to other energy sources. We are at the
beginning stages of capping coal in China but much more needs to be
done. If we price coal and other fossil fuels to capture their true
costs, it will immediately make all the alternatives to fossil fuels
more competitive and drive innovations in the clean energy sector.
In China there is huge room for growth in energy efficiency, solar
and wind. Nuclear might have a role too, but I predict that it will
be more limited than what these climate scientists were suggesting
in their recent appeal.
Nuclear has problems. To many of us in China and nearby regions, the
Fukushima accident was a huge wake-up call on the dangers of nuclear
power. First it set off a panic about food safety as millions rushed
to grocery stores to buy salt, which helps to prevent illnesses
associated with radiation. But more important, we realized that
nuclear power creates serious environmental justice burdens: nearby
communities face hugely disproportionate risks from a nuclear
catastrophe. Nuclear energy itself is also not as low carbon as
people think when you factor in true lifecycle costs, including
mining uranium.
I’d rather see our society focus on new technologies and policy
incentives that promote the many safer, truly clean forms of energy.
But it all starts with pricing fossil fuels out of the market.
That’s the first step and the most important one.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
