On Apr 9, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Robert Naiman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't understand what your point is or how it is relevant to my point. My > point doesn't require agreement on "what is constitutive of non-violent, > anti-social behavior." On the contrary, in my view, the fact that what is > considered "non-violent, anti-social behavior" is intrinsically a judgment > which could be contested lends support to the view that the use of > incarceration to punish and deter it should face a very high bar. > =============== If you don’t require agreement, then you are providing aid and comfort to those who wish to incarcerate irrespective of what others think, provided they get the votes. Arrow’s theorem and criminalization are a huge problem, no? E.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
