On 4/28/15 1:12 PM, Charlie wrote: > Besides name-calling, you throw out a scatter of remarks about slavery. > It is largely irrelevant to the problem of how some economies based on > peasants and feudal, tributary, and/or landlord exploitation of them - > and on keeping them in place as much as possible - became economies > based on wage labor, which can be pushed from one industry to the next, > which is necessary for vigorous capital accumulation.
What's the matter? You don't like being labeled a Stalinist after posting KKE bullshit on a daily basis here? Plus, you are fifty times more abusive than me, which puts you in rather rarefied company. In terms of the rest of your message, I won't bother responding to someone trying to encapsulate a thousand years of economic history in a couple of dozen words. I have better things to do with my time and energy. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
