Well, that's rather glib. I find value in Nitzan and Bichler's analysis; don't agree with everything they write. But "can't stand examination"? Is that because you can't stand to examine it?
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:31 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > "Charles Brown" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "Academic church " is the idea that academic economists have a "religion > " , a religious like dogma ? Or is this a church for real ? > > > Capital is a category of power. Is this a Nietszchean approach ? > > Nitzan and Bichler aren't going to reply because they don't have a theory > that can stand > examination. > > -- > Ron > > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
