Capital Accumulation: Fiction and Reality
by Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan
Working Papers on Capital as Power, No. 2015/03, June.

FULL TEXT:http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/442/
VIDEO LINK to the paper's presentation: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh7ZPJHDeac

What do economists mean when they talk about ‘capital accumulation’? 
Surprisingly, the answer to this question is anything but clear, and it 
seems the most unclear in times of turmoil. Consider the recent 
‘financial crisis’. The very term already attests to the presumed nature 
and causes of the crisis, which most observers indeed believe originated 
in the financial sector and was amplified by pervasive financialization.

However, when theorists speak about a financial crisis, they don’t speak 
about it in isolation. They refer to finance not in and of itself, but 
in relation to the so-called real capital stock. The recent crisis, they 
argue, happened not because of finance as such, but due to a mismatch 
between financial and real capital. The world of finance, they complain, 
has deviated from and distorted the real world of accumulation. And 
since, according to Milton Friedman, there is no such thing as a free 
lunch, it is only fitting that, having indulged in this distortion, we 
must now pay the price for it in the form of a financial crisis.

This ‘mismatch thesis’ – the notion of a reality distorted by finance – 
is broadly accepted. In 2009, The Economist of London accused its 
readers of confusing ‘financial assets with real ones’, singling out 
their confusion as the root cause of the brewing crisis. Real assets, or 
wealth, the magazine explained, consist of ‘goods and products we wish 
to consume’ or of ‘things that give us the ability to produce more of 
what we want to consume’. Financial assets, by contrast, are not wealth; 
they are simply ‘claims on real wealth’. To confuse the inflation of 
latter for the expansion of the former is the surest recipe for disaster.

The division between real wealth and financial claims on real wealth is 
a fundamental premise of political economy. This premise is accepted not 
only by liberal theorists, analysts and policymakers, but also by 
Marxists of various persuasions. And as we shall show below, it is a 
premise built on very shaky foundations.

When liberals and Marxists say that there is a mismatch between 
financial and real capital, they are essentially making, explicitly or 
implicitly, three related claims: (1) that these are indeed separate 
entities; (2) that these entities should correspond to each other; and 
(3) that, in the actual world, they often do not.

In what follows, we explain why these claims don’t hold water. To put it 
bluntly, neither liberals nor Marxists know how to compare real and 
financial capital, and the main reason is simple enough: they don’t know 
how to determine the magnitude of real capital to start with. The 
common, makeshift solution is to estimate this magnitude indirectly, by 
using the money price of capital goods – yet this doesn’t solve the 
problem either, since capital goods can have many prices and there is no 
way of knowing which of them, if any, is the ‘true’ one. Last but not 
least, even if we turn a blind eye and allow for these logical 
impossibilities and empirical travesties to stand, the result is still 
highly embarrassing. As it turns out, financial accumulation not only 
deviates from and distorts real accumulation, it also follows an 
opposite trajectory. For more than two centuries, economists left and 
right have argued that capitalism thrives on ‘real investment’ and the 
growth of ‘real capital’. But as we shall see, in reality, the best time 
for capitalists is when their ‘real accumulation’ tanks! . . . .

FULL TEXT:http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/442/
VIDEO LINK to the paper's presentation: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh7ZPJHDeac

***

Recent additions and updates to the Bichler & Nitzan Archives: 
http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/perl/latest

Free to repost and circulate with due attribution under the Creative 
Commons License (attribution-noncommercial-no derivative). To 
unsubscribe, reply to this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.


-- 
Jonathan Nitzan
Political Science
York University
4700 Keele St.
Toronto, Ontario, M3J-1P3
Canada
Voice: (416) 736-2100, ext. 88822
Fax: (416) 736-5686
Email: nitzan at yorku.ca
Website:http://bnarchives.net

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to