http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/technology/supreme-court-rejects-2-antitrust-cases.html The Supreme Court, when refusing to review cases, does not provide its rationale for rejection. But by leaving both rulings intact, the court seemed to side with the federal appeals court judge, Richard A. Posner, who wrote the decision in the Chicago civil case brought by Motorola.Judge Posner, a noted legal theorist, wrote that companies could not “pick and choose from the benefits and burdens of United States corporate citizenship” — seeking the shelter of America’s strong antitrust laws while setting up subsidiaries in low-tax overseas jurisdictions, for example. (Motorola said it had repatriated the profits from its foreign units during the years covered by the case.)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
