Chronicle of Higher Education, July 20, 2015

When Activism Is Worth the Risk
Academics who champion causes may be gambling with their careers. But 
for some dedicated activists, the choice is clear.

By Audrey Williams June

Justin Hansford lives 10 minutes from Ferguson, Mo., where last summer a 
white policeman shot and killed Michael Brown, an unarmed black 
teenager. The incident set off months of protests, as people from all 
walks of life took a stand against police brutality.

Mr. Hansford, an assistant professor of law at Saint Louis University, 
just back from a conference in Washington, was among them. When he 
joined the law faculty at the university, in 2011, it never occurred to 
him to cast his causes aside: "I was an activist before I was a scholar, 
you could say."

In the months since the unrest in Ferguson, Mr. Hansford has become a 
well-known face in the Black Lives Matter movement. He has served as a 
legal observer during protests, was once arrested and jailed overnight, 
and was a key organizer of #FergusonToGeneva, a delegation that frames 
police violence in the United States as a human-rights issue worthy of 
global attention. Mr. Hansford and others in the group accompanied 
Michael Brown’s family to Geneva in November to testify before the 
United Nations Committee Against Torture.

"There’s a tradition of black scholar-activists who fought for justice," 
says Mr. Hansford, who studies human rights, legal ethics, legal 
history, and critical race theory. "This particular activism is almost 
like a calling for me." But he knows it could hinder his academic career.

With issues of social justice dominating the national conversation, some 
academics identify as scholar-activists, a term typically used by those 
deeply involved in progressive causes. They take to the streets as part 
of protest movements, work alongside community organizers, and push for 
policy changes, applying their research to underserved communities. Yet 
balancing activism and scholarship can be risky, especially while on the 
tenure track.

Scholar-activists must be ready to fend off the perception that their 
activism taints their scholarship, or that they’re going to indoctrinate 
students. Another challenge is time: Some academics struggle to contain 
their work in the community to do what’s needed to advance professionally.

Juggling the two identities isn’t new, but the task seems tougher today. 
The crowd was perhaps thicker during and just after the civil-rights and 
political movements of the 1960s and ’70s, which drew in so many young 
people, future professors among them. Now activists are more visible, 
their protests or remarks potentially bringing unwanted attention on 
social media or cable news — and prompting complaints to universities. 
Meanwhile, the academic job market in many disciplines is tight.

"We all know that the talented, well-educated young people who are 
getting Ph.D.s today are unlikely to secure tenure-track jobs," says 
Frances Fox Piven, a professor of political science and sociology at the 
Graduate Center of the City University of New York and a longtime 
activist for the poor. "If they’re more insecure, they’re less 
confident. And they’re inevitably more eager to seek the approval of the 
people who are the senior academics who are going to make the judgments 
on whether they get the job, whether they get tenured, or whether they 
get promoted."

Young academics may decide that now isn’t the time to give those 
committees an excuse to turn them down. Some give up their activism, for 
a while anyway. Others choose the hyphenated life, aware of the hazards 
but hopeful that if their scholarship measures up, their activism won’t 
count against them. Many look for ways to tie that work to their 
professional goals, optimistic that, at some point, their universities 
will acknowledge that. On an online forum for sociologists, someone 
recently asked if activism should count toward tenure, generating mostly 
responses that it should not.

Still, institutions may find reasons to support scholar-activists, many 
of whom are women and people of color. Signaling to a new generation 
that engagement with social issues isn’t necessarily a career-killer 
could help in diversifying the faculty. Successful role models might be 
a draw for younger scholars.

A sense of urgency, not a calculation of risk, has guided Mr. Hansford. 
"When the Mike Brown situation happened, there was no time for me to 
say, ‘Well, I’ll wait a year until I get tenure,’ " he says. His dean 
has not discouraged him. The decision on the assistant professor’s bid 
for tenure should come this academic year, but that hasn’t deterred Mr. 
Hansford: "It would be too much of a compromise for me to hold back on 
my activism because of that."

Many describe the life of a scholar and an activist as one of isolation 
and constant pressure, but also of determination.

When Rebecca Tarlau began a Ph.D. in social and cultural studies in 
education at the University of California at Berkeley, she was dedicated 
to both worlds. She helped organize statewide protests of tuition 
increases and served as a leader in the graduate-student union as it 
fought for higher salaries and better benefits.

"I wanted to be a part of how higher education was being remade," says 
Ms. Tarlau, now a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University’s Graduate 
School of Education. But even as she built a reputation as a community 
organizer, she carved out enough time to establish the bona fides — 
publications in top journals, for instance — that are respected in academe.

"You have to do the scholarship just as well as the activism," says Ms. 
Tarlau, who studies the intersection of social movements and education 
and the development of global educational systems, particularly in 
Brazil. "I knew I had to hit the steppingstones of what’s considered 
successful in graduate school."

That’s the time when some aspiring scholar-activists doubt they can pull 
it off. Rajani Bhatia saw a Ph.D. as a way to enhance her work in the 
reproductive-rights movement, including a job at an advocacy group. But 
once in a women’s-studies program at the University of Maryland at 
College Park, she found that staying on top of her courses, teaching 
undergraduates, and pursuing a research agenda stripped her of spare time.

"I realized the very first year that I was going have to give up certain 
aspects of my life," says Ms. Bhatia, who is now an assistant professor 
of women’s studies at the University at Albany. "For me, it was my 
activism."

With her tenure clock ticking, Ms. Bhatia still keeps her activist work 
at a minimum. She maintains connections to groups she used to 
collaborate with and tries to attend some academic conferences that draw 
scholar-activists, but that’s about all she can manage, she says. "My 
clear priority is getting tenure."

The pressure to tamp down activism can also be external. April L. 
Few-Demo remembers, as an assistant professor of human development at 
Virginia Tech, a turning point in her academic career. In her 
fourth-year review, she was told to publish more, she says, and to cut 
back on service that had an activist bent.

On the advice of her department chair, she chose community outreach and 
service activities that could yield strong submissions to academic 
journals. She altered her teaching, informed by black feminist pedagogy, 
by giving fewer writing assignments, so as to limit the time she spent 
grading and focus more on research, she says. Ms. Few-Demo, who 
chronicled her efforts to balance activism with the demands of earning 
tenure in a journal article, became a tenured associate professor in the 
department in 2006.

"People are still facing the same challenges as I did then," she says of 
young professors today.

Scholar-activists at any point in their careers have to reckon with the 
perception of bias and watch how they represent themselves to students.

"Calling yourself a scholar-activist, in a way, puts a target on you in 
the classroom," says Carl S. Taylor, a professor of sociology at 
Michigan State University and an expert on youth violence in urban 
America. A native of Detroit, he conducts research there and works with 
young people and various organizations to help reduce violence in the 
community. "You have students who will applaud you for what you do," he 
says, "and those that won’t."

Mr. Hansford, of Saint Louis University, can relate. After his night in 
jail, last October, he went to teach his first-year torts class. He 
didn’t bring up the experience of his first time behind bars, he says. 
"I didn’t feel as if it was a safe space to mention it."

Some students in that class had already complained to his dean, Mr. 
Hansford says, that he was difficult to meet with because he was so 
busy. Others, he knew, agreed with the steady stream of alumni who 
emailed him, he says, to make clear that they opposed his activism and 
to threaten to withhold donations to the institution.

In some cases, it can at least appear that a scholar’s activism plays a 
role in his or her career’s going awry. David Graeber, an anthropologist 
and radical activist who helped to set up the Occupy Wall Street 
movement, had trouble finding an academic job in the United States. Yale 
University decided not to renew his contract in 2005, though it didn’t 
point to his activism as an underlying factor. Mr. Graeber is now a 
professor of anthropology at the London School of Economics and 
Political Science.

Even when the details of a hiring, tenure, or promotion decision are 
complex or unknown, a denial can deter younger scholars.

For now, if they find support, it’s more likely to be individual than 
institutional.

Many scholar-activists point to a mentor or role model they looked to 
for guidance or inspiration early on. Laura Pulido, a professor of 
American studies and ethnicity at the University of Southern California, 
is one of those role models.

Over the years, says Ms. Pulido, who is known for her work on social and 
environmental justice, she has entertained countless questions from 
young academics about how to navigate their careers. She wrote a chapter 
for a book on methods of activist scholarship, published in 2008, that 
featured answers to frequently asked questions.

At the top of the list: How her institution responds to her activist 
work. For the most part, Ms. Pulido wrote, she hasn’t "faced any real 
problems with administrators." Producing top-notch scholarship is key. 
So is landing in an academic home that embraces scholar-activists, she 
says. That might not always be the most highly ranked destination in a 
given field.

Such a trade-off is often necessary, says Rose M. Brewer, a professor of 
African-American and African studies at the University of Minnesota-Twin 
Cities. Also crucial is a group of like-minded people, to avoid what can 
become crippling isolation.

Even then, says Ms. Brewer, a founding member of the Black Radical 
Congress, aspiring scholar-activists should know what they’re getting 
into: "There might be tremendous battles and struggles if you go down 
this road."

Some people do manage to find a good fit. Stephany Rose, a newly tenured 
associate professor of women’s and ethnic studies at the University of 
Colorado at Colorado Springs says her interview in 2010 encouraged her 
that she could flourish there.

For starters, her future colleagues already understood her area of 
research, critical whiteness studies. For almost a decade, the 
university had co-sponsored a national conference on white privilege. 
She got the impression that activist work was considered appropriate in 
her line of scholarship. "They had done their due diligence on me," she 
says. "They were very forthcoming and let me know what they value."

The Women’s and Ethnic Studies Program tries to make that impression, 
says Andrea Herrera, the program’s director.

"When we created our tenure-and-promotion criteria, it’s implicitly 
stated that we value community activism," Ms. Herrera says. "Now when we 
hire people, that’s the kind of people that we attract, the kind who 
value that kind of work."

Some institutions and academic departments recognize "engaged 
scholarship," or research done in partnership with communities. Revised 
tenure policies at Michigan State, Portland State, and Syracuse 
Universities regard engaged scholarship as legitimate work. Syracuse’s 
faculty manual says the university is "committed to longstanding 
traditions of scholarship as well as evolving perspectives" and will 
continue to "support scholars in all of these traditions, including 
faculty who choose to participate in engaged scholarship."

Activism hasn’t reached that level of acceptance. But some scholars see 
signs that it is gaining traction as a worthwhile pursuit.

Gregory C. Ellison II, a recently tenured associate professor of 
pastoral care and counseling at Emory University, is still trying to 
"figure out how to broker" the scholar-activist life, he says. He 
founded the organization Fearless Dialogues, which brings together 
unlikely groups of people — pastors, gang members, government leaders, 
drug dealers, and students, for instance — to discuss the issues that 
plague young black males and come up with ways to improve their communities.

Traveling to at least 30 cities with that group, trying to change how 
black men are perceived, he saw his work as risky. But during a recent 
presentation for some Emory administrators and trustees, the response 
was more affirming than he expected.

"They began to talk about my role as a professor and my role as an 
activist," Mr. Ellison says, as well as about how best to measure 
success for those who are both. "It was humbling, but also gratifying, 
to know that there are actually allies at the upper echelon of the 
university who are concerned about this."

Jan Love, dean of Emory’s Candler School of Theology, says its 
"bottom-line standard" for evaluating research — publications in 
refereed journals and books published by top presses — accommodates the 
kind of activist work that is the backbone of Mr. Ellison’s scholarship.

"Within that standard, we are determined to support a wide range of 
styles of scholarship," Ms. Love says. "One of our intentions as an 
entire school is to shape public debate about pressing moral issues of 
the day. We don’t think there’s a trade-off between very fine scholarly 
work that’s informed by one’s guild and public engagement."

Such support may grow, if it does at all, only in pockets. Meanwhile, 
scholars like Mr. Hansford are trying to fulfill personal commitments 
along with professional expectations. He recently co-wrote a scholarly 
article based on a report he helped draft to present to the United 
Nations. His trip to Geneva also informed the human-rights course he 
teaches. And as a Fulbright scholar, he is now in South Africa to study 
the legal career of Nelson Mandela.

During a recent panel discussion at the University of California at Los 
Angeles on the Black Lives Matter movement, Mr. Hansford was pointed 
about priorities: "How important is this movement, and what are we 
willing to risk?"

3 Scholar-Activists Balance Passion for Activism With Life in Academe

Laura Pulido

Professor, American studies and ethnicity
U. of Southern California

Activist work: Environmental justice; political and antiracism movements

"Theoretically your activism should not affect your tenure and 
promotion, but we all know that it can. They may not like what you do as 
an activist, so you definitely have to have a scholarly record to defend."

Stephany Rose
Associate professor, women’s and ethnic studies
U. of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Activist work: Antiprivilege movement

"Waiting until after tenure to be an activist is a strategy, but it’s 
not a strategy for me. I feel like if I can’t be upfront with you from 
the beginning, I don’t want to be here long term. I need to be able to 
live life out loud."


Gregory C. Ellison II
Associate professor, pastoral care and counseling
Emory U.

Activist work: Young, black, marginalized men and their communities

"Being a scholar-activist, at its core, is being a bridge builder. I 
feel like I’ve been afforded some access and resources that I can’t 
hoard for myself. If that involves me moving between the academy and the 
church and psychology and the community, then that’s what it takes."

---

Audrey Williams June is a senior reporter who writes about the academic 
workplace, faculty pay, and work-life balance in academe. Contact her at 
[email protected], or follow her on Twitter @chronaudrey.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to