Always quick to label someone sectarian, L.P. links to his post that is 
sectarian to the maximum. He argues by quotations, does nothing to 
establish that his snippets are not selective, and leaves us devoid of 
materialist analysis of the economy under tsarism.

"The problem in Russia was industrialization. It was obvious by 
comparison with England, Germany, France, and so on. In 1917 there were 
three million workers among a population of 145 million. The working 
class was concentrated in large factories (one thousand workers or more) 
to a greater degree than the United States. Still, eight out of ten 
people were peasants, and 30,000 large landowners exploited them. The 
capitalist class was incapable of leading a revolution against the tsar, 
hoping instead to win a place alongside the land-based aristocrats in a 
reformed monarchy. Then industrialization could proceed over a span of 
fifty years, similar to Japan after the so-called Meiji Restoration. 
Although a few tsarist officials were of similar mind, notably the 
police-state expert Peter Stolypin, the regime did not budge. The 
working class made the 1917 revolution and proceeded to tackle 
industrialization run by the working class for the benefit of the 
working people." (The Hollow Colossus, p. 167f.)

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to