Change comes from mass movements which (a) educate themselves through  their 
own practice and reflection on that practice  and (b) force those in power to 
choose between serious change on the one hand and (b) ruling purely through 
force. (And as Barbara Jeanne Fields has pointed out, when only force remains, 
nothing remains.) The power of such politicians as Sanders resides in their 
capacity to perusaude the "raghus" of the world that they need only to give 
away their power to some savior such as Sanders or . . . .)

Your belief in Sanders is constitutes The Fundamental Power of Neoliberalism.

Carrol

Carrol



-----Original Message-----
From: pen-l-boun...@lists.csuchico.edu 
[mailto:pen-l-boun...@lists.csuchico.edu] On Behalf Of raghu
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 1:33 PM
To: Progressive Economics
Subject: [Pen-l] Bernie Sanders and rust belt populism

I don't know quite what to make of this, but if this is even partially true, 
please explain again how the Sanders campaign is the enemy of the left?


http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/why-bernie-sanders-starting-attract-conservative-voters

--------------------------snip
Nate Silver has the Bernie Sanders campaign figured out. Ignore what happens in 
Iowa and New Hampshire, the “data-driven” prognostication wizard wrote back in 
July, when Sanders was polling a healthy 30 percent to Clinton’s 46 percent in 
both contests. That’s only, Silver says, because “Democratic caucus-goers in 
Iowa and Democratic primary voters in New Hampshire are liberal and white, and 
that’s the core of Sanders’ support.”
 
Silver has a chart. It shows that when you multiply the number of liberals and 
whites among state electorates, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Iowa rank first, 
second, and third. Texas is near the bottom—a place where Bernie Sanders should 
feel about as welcome as a La Raza convention at the Alamo, right?
 
I have a new friend who begs to differ.
 
It’s July 20, and my airplane seatmate asks what brought me to Texas. He is a 
construction company sales executive from Houston. He’s watching Fox News on 
his cell phone. He tells me he considers himself a conservative. I tell him I’m 
a political reporter covering the Bernie Sanders campaign. He perks up: “I like 
what I’ve heard from him. Kind of middle of the road.”
 
Eleven days later, I’m at a Bernie Sanders house party in the depressed steel 
town of Griffith, Indiana, in a state that places in the bottom quartile on 
Silver’s chart. I approach a young man in his twenties wearing a thrift store 
T-shirt. I ask him what brings him here tonight.
 
“I’m just helping out my friends because they asked me to help out,” he tells 
me. He adds that he’s a conservative: “But I approve of some of the stuff that 
Bernie stands for. Like appealing to more than just the one percent and just 
trying to give everybody a leg up who’s needing it these days.” Data-driven 
analysis is only as good as the categories by which you sift the information. 
If you’ve already decided that “liberals” are the people who prefer locally 
sourced arugula to eating at McDonald’s, or are the people who don’t watch Fox 
News, it is a reasonable conclusion that there aren’t enough “liberals” out 
there to elect Bernie Sanders. Yet political categories shift. One of the 
things the best politicians do is work to shift them.



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to