Gimme that old time religion: anti-xenophobia populism.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-w-gerard/burn-the-tpp_b_8799138.html

Leo W. Gerard
International President, United Steelworkers
Burn the TPP
12/14/2015

Middle America is smoldering. For too long, average citizens worked harder
and produced more, yet corporations cut pay and benefits, off-shored
community-sustaining factories, killed family-supporting jobs and crushed
opportunity.

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump stokes that fire by urging
Americans to blame anyone but corporations and corporate honchos like
himself. One-percenter Trump and his fellow GOP candidates exhort average
Americans to hate and fear Muslims, Syrian refugees, Black Lives Matter
activists and undocumented immigrants.

This is a divisionary tactic. The intent is to split workers into small
sub-groups so they lose strength in numbers. And it’s a diversionary
tactic. The ungodly wealthy like Trump, who have taken for themselves all
the economic gains from increased worker productivity, finger someone other
than one-percenters as the culprit for middle-class wage stagnation and
provoke workers to fight among themselves.

Division and diversion help the one percent capture government, securing
policies that further enrich the rich, like trickle-down economics under
which no benefits ever actually descend, bailouts for Wall Street but not
Main Street and job-destroying trade deals like NAFTA and the proposed
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In a real democracy, one where government
serves the 99 percent, the smoldering in America would be piles of
discarded TPP texts.

Burning it was advised last week by the Labor Advisory Committee on the
TPP, a group established by Congress that includes representatives of every
major labor union and labor coalition in America, among them mine, the
United Steelworkers (USW). In a 120-page report, the committee detailed
exactly how the proposed TPP would injure working Americans and foster the
closing and off-shoring of vital American industry, such as steel, aluminum
and vehicle manufacturing.

TPP negotiators should start over, the Labor Advisory Committee said. They
should produce a deal that puts workers first, not corporations and the one
percent.

Unlike labor groups, giant multinational corporations, especially those
like Nike <http://tppcoalition.org/about/> andWalmart
<http://tppcoalition.org/about/> that exploit slave-wage labor overseas,
love the TPP proposal. They hype it using diversion. Look, the U.S.
Coalition (of massive corporations) for the TPP says,here’s a map
<http://tppcoalition.org/?location=pa> showing how much each U.S. state
exports to the 11 other Pacific Rim countries in the proposed deal.

It’s classic hocus-pocus. What the map fails to show is how much each state
imports from the 11 countries. And that’s the problem.

When imports exceed exports, creating a trade deficit, Americans lose jobs.
That’s exactly what happened under NAFTA. That deal cost more than 845,000
<http://www.citizen.org/documents/NAFTA-at-20.pdf> U.S. workers their jobs
as their factories closed or moved south of the border and consumers then
bought goods manufactured in Mexico rather than in the United States.

The same thing happened after the United States agreed in 2001 to allow
China into the World Trade Organization. The resulting trade deficit
eliminated or displaced 3.2 million American jobs
<http://www.epi.org/publication/the-wal-mart-effect/>.

Every time one of these trade deals is proposed, corporations eager to
replace American factory workers with long-hour, low-wage foreign
<http://www.globallabourrights.org/reports/dirty-toys-made-in-china?can_id=2afebca4e8fa876fc483c6f145ccd2dd&source=email-dirty-toys-made-in-china-disney-hasbro-and-mattel-must-act&email_referrer=dirty-toys-made-in-china-disney-hasbro-and-mattel-must-act&email_subject=dirty-toys-made-in-china-disney-hasbro-and-mattel-must-act&link_id=0>laborers
promise exports will rise. And often they do. But imports rise much more.
And as more stuff is shipped to the United States, American factories
close. American workers lose their jobs. And the American middle class
shrinks.

The Labor Advisory Committee urged TPP negotiators to include strong,
enforceable measures in the deal to prevent this pattern from recurring.
They didn’t.

In fact, under the TPP, American workers would lose protections. For
example, as it is now, the U.S. government can specify that tax dollars go
to create jobs in the United States under the Buy America and Buy American
programs. When the federal government builds a new highway or helps fund a
sewage treatment plant, it has the right to specify that the steel and
concrete be made by American workers in the United States.

The TPP would limit that. Under the TPP, American tax dollars spent on
public projects could go to create jobs in Vietnam or Malaysia or Brunei.
That means more American jobs lost. But look away, multinational
corporations say. Don’t think about those disappearing opportunities.

The TPP also would thrust middle-class Americans into a wage race to the
bottom by pitting them against foreign workers paid pennies per hour and
against child and forced laborers. The TPP would, for example, allow
Vietnam to do absolutely nothing for five years about violations of
workers’ rights in certain areas while the country immediately receives the
benefits of tariff cuts on its products exported to the United States. That
would put American workers in competition with those in Vietnam
earning an average
of $150 a month.
<http://www.thanhniennews.com/society/vietnams-minimum-wage-to-increase-1418-per-month-in-2015-29590.html>


But look away, stateless multinational corporations say. Don’t think about
the fact that, after inflation, the vast majority of American workers’
wages have flat-lined or fallen since 1979
<http://www.epi.org/publication/stagnant-wages-in-2014/>, and the TPP
would, clearly, worsen that terrible trend. Don’t worry, multinational
corporations say, the TPP would require nations to establish and enforce
minimum wages. Don’t think about the fact that the TPP fails to set any
sort of standard, enabling a country to institute a minimum wage of 5 cents
an hour. Or less.

The Labor Advisory Committee sought to protect American workers by asking
the TPP negotiators to include strong measures to stop currency
manipulation and to require a high percentage of a product to be
manufactured within a TPP country for it to be exempt from tariffs when
exported to the United States.

The negotiators did neither. That’s no surprise since they were
formally advised
by 500 corporate lobbyists
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lori-wallach/wto-orders-sanctions-unle_b_8748594.html>.
Instead of increasing the percentage of a product that must be manufactured
in a TPP country, the deal would lower it when compared to the standards in
previous trade pacts.

Rather than penalizing currency manipulation, the TPP would do nothing more
than evaluate the practice that countries like Japan and Vietnam use to
artificially lower the price of their products while raising the price of
American-made exports.

The multinational corporations that want to manufacture in low-wage,
low-environmental-protection foreign countries say: Look, there’s something
about currency manipulation glommed onto the bottom of the TPP.  It’s not
part of the main deal, doesn’t include strong language and isn’t
enforceable. But, look away. Check out that guy who speaks broken English
standing on the street corner trying desperately to get work as a day
laborer.

The Labor Advisory Committee wants average Americans to look directly at
this bad trade scheme and the self-dealing corporations pushing it. The
measure of trade success should be improving broadly shared prosperity,
increasing family-supporting jobs and raising middle-class wages. Corporate
profits should rise as well. But the first priority, in a democracy, should
be people, not corporations.

The proposed TPP fails this test. Americans’ anger should be directed where
it’s deserved. Not at Muslims or Hispanics. But at any politician who would
vote to approve this proposal to further lower their wages, destroy their
jobs and diminish their economic opportunity.
===

Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
(202) 448-2898 x1
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to