The Paris Agreement is a system of smoke and mirrors
designed to convince the TV watching public that those in
power have finally decided to solve the climate crisis.  The
main obstacle preventing effective climate action, namely
the capitalist world system, has never been questioned in
Paris.  (One cannot expect the leaders of this system to
question their system.)  The true purpose of the agreement
is to protect capitalism from climate blow-back, i.e., to
enable those presently in power to continue to mis-manage
the world's resources and technologies, and to convince the
pesky masses that they can go back to sleep.

Therefore now it is especially important to maintain and
increase the momentum of the climate movement.  I
personally am not sure if the movement will have gained
enough strength before so much CO2 has been pumped into the
atmosphere that it will be impossible to maintain civilized
life past this century, but it is certainly worth trying.

I am pessimistic for one main reason:  Humanity is facing
two deadlines, one in 5 years, and one in 35 years (this is
my rough guess based on some of the scientific literature I
am following).  In 35 years the climate will have changed
so much that everybody on earth realizes the gravity of the
situation and will call for radical changes --- because
continuing as usual has physically become impossible.  But
in 35 years it will be too late.  The radical measures
which people will consider reasonable when they see their
house on fire must be already taken now, in the next 5
years, during a time when things still look peaceful and
where it does not seem reasonable to change behavior, laws
and international relations as radically as is necessary to
wean the world economy of fossil fuels and switch from
growth to sustainability.

I definitely think it is worth trying for another reason:
People realize that their own innocent daily habits and
behavior is wrecking the climate.  And they are taught, by
us economists, that this practical activity is shaped by
their utility functions.  They do not understand that their
resource-destructive lifestyles are not their own creation
but are generated by the need of the capitalist system to
reproduce itself.  The fact that social relations are
mistaken as part of our human nature has been called
"commodity fetishism".  I am optimistic because I think
people are able to overcome the mis-conception that it is
necessary to fight against their own human nature, a fight
which they know is doomed from the beginning, therefore
they do not see a way out.  But there is a way out.  The
masses have to fight against the social constraints imposed
on them by the capitalist system, which is only a few
centuries old and which can be replaced by a different
social order.

I do not mean to say that we first have to make world
revolution before we can address climate change, species
extinctions, the destruction of our oceans etc.  The first
step must be that popular pressure everywhere leads to a
highly regulated capitalism, and that competition between
nations has to be replaced by cooperation.  Embryos of this
are indeed in the Paris Agreement.  I agree with many others
that the promises of the Paris Agreement, which were
carefully designed so that they can remain empty, should be
taken as a framework for a world wide mass movement in which
governments everywhere will be forced by their populations
to keep these promises and to strengthen them.  I am sure
that many individuals in these governments will be delighted
to be forced by the masses to do the things which they know
must be done but which their official position does not
allow them to do on their own.

Therefore I see some possibilities, there is light at the
end of the tunnel.  But if we wait until we reach the end
of the tunnel it will be too late.  We have to replace the
darkness of our capitalist tunnel by light right now, while
we are still deep inside the tunnel, because the first
deadline I talked about is not at the end of the tunnel but
in the middle of the tunnel.  This is the real challenge.


Hans G Ehrbar
Econ Professor Emeritus
University of Utah
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to