As I pointed out somewhere along the line, Greeks were wary of the 
devaluation that would have accompanied a Grexit because they had bitter 
memories of how painful it was the last time it happened in the mid-80s 
(http://louisproyect.org/2015/03/02/why-greeks-might-fear-a-return-to-a-devalued-drachma/).
 
Argentinians have had similar experiences as well, the latest 
installment occurring now.

NY Times, Dec. 28 2015
Argentina’s New President Moves Swiftly to Shake Up the Economy
By JONATHAN GILBERT

BUENOS AIRES — Mauricio Macri clinched Argentina’s presidency last month 
by tapping into voters’ fatigue with a leftist political movement that 
had governed for more than 12 years. Campaigning on a platform of 
change, and promising to unite feuding factions while largely dodging 
specific policy proposals, Mr. Macri took 51 percent of the vote.

But now, just three weeks into his four-year term, Mr. Macri’s sweeping 
economic changes are roiling Argentina, accentuating the divide he 
wanted to bridge and leading some Argentines to doubt whether he will be 
a change for the better.

“They voted for him to get the government out, but they didn’t think 
about what was going to come,” said Damián Raspa, 36, a machine worker 
at an electronics factory from La Matanza, a working-class district of 
greater Buenos Aires where Mr. Macri lost heavily to his main rival in 
the election, Daniel Scioli.

Mr. Raspa, a father of two who earns about $615 a month, said he would 
now have to make his salary stretch because Mr. Macri’s government 
devalued the peso by nearly 30 percent in mid-December, to more than 13 
pesos to the dollar from 9.8; it later strengthened slightly.

The devaluation and a slashing of export taxes favored influential 
farmers on Argentina’s Pampas lowlands who had speculated about such 
moves by hoarding their grain harvests. They struck an agreement with 
Mr. Macri’s government to immediately sell billions of dollars of grain 
stocks, like soy, to ease the shortage of funds at the Central Bank.

But while these agricultural exports are now more profitable for the 
farmers, for people like Mr. Raspa, the devaluation is eroding their 
salaries and fueling price increases as imports become more expensive.

In his first days in office, Mr. Macri has made quick-fire, 
market-oriented changes meant to reinvigorate the economy after sluggish 
business investment and growth in recent years.

In contrast, his predecessor, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who had 
bruising clashes with the farmers, preferred driving demand through 
policies like energy subsidies for consumers.

Paving the way for the devaluation, Mr. Macri scrapped most of Mrs. 
Kirchner’s currency controls, an unpopular measure that had thwarted 
foreign investment because businesses were unable to repatriate their 
profits. He is also expected to end bureaucratic procedures that 
prevented manufacturers from importing needed equipment and parts. As 
the government seeks to reduce the largest budget deficit in three 
decades, Juan José Aranguren, the energy minister, has said the costly 
energy subsidies are being reviewed.

Many Argentines welcome the changes. Daniel Álvarez, 57, who works at a 
hardware store in La Matanza, said that under the Kirchner 
administration, precarious Central Bank foreign reserves were being 
hemorrhaged to shore up the peso. “They didn’t leave a buck,” Mr. 
Álvarez said. “Both Macri and Scioli were going to devalue. There was no 
other option to get dollars in. Yes, it directly favors the farmers, but 
the idea is that indirectly it favors us.”

By cutting export taxes for farmers — and manufacturers, too — Mr. Macri 
wants to increase business profits; easing import restrictions will 
provide greater scope to reinvest these profits, driving production and, 
subsequently, economic growth, his advisers say. Mario Blejer, a former 
Central Bank president who was an adviser to Mr. Scioli, said Mr. Macri 
was on the correct path. “Without growth, the redistribution of income 
is impossible,” Mr. Blejer said. “And to grow, you need investment.”

But in the short term, there is the danger of fueling inflation, which 
is already about 25 percent, according to unofficial estimates 
frequently used because the national statistics institute’s figures have 
not been trustworthy. In turn, if real wages do not keep up, battles 
could break out between the government and powerful trade union leaders. 
Political and social organizations are already panicked about Mr. 
Macri’s moves.

“We’re very angry and worried,” said Juan Grabois, a lawyer for the 
Confederation of Workers of the Popular Economy, which represents 
workers in Argentina’s gray economy, like recyclers and street hawkers. 
“This is the false theory of trickle-down economics that will only 
result in the destruction of Argentina’s social fabric.”

Eduardo Levy Yeyati, an economics professor at Torcuato di Tella 
University here and a visiting professor of public policy at the Kennedy 
School of Government at Harvard, said Mr. Macri, who had tiptoed around 
his plans during the campaign, now faced the hard political task of 
following through with adjustments even though the economy, boosted by 
the government’s pre-election spending, improved this year. “There’s a 
disconnection between perceptions and the economic reality,” said 
Professor Levy Yeyati, emphasizing the unsustainability of a large 
budget deficit and an overvalued currency. “It’s impossible to explain 
these things to the public when they feel like they’re doing O.K.”

Mr. Macri must also tread carefully, analysts said, because of his small 
margin of victory in the election. A decision to temporarily appoint 
Supreme Court judges by decree, bypassing Congress during its summer 
recess, was criticized as an overreach of executive power. This, 
together with moves viewed as steps toward the dismantling of a media 
law that is strongly endorsed by Mrs. Kirchner’s supporters, has left 
him less room for unpopular measures.

Mr. Macri has already moved to cool the simmering economic tensions, 
keeping Mrs. Kirchner’s price control programs in place for now and 
offering a small one-time payment to around eight million recipients of 
state pensions or child benefits.

Still, repercussions are already being felt. “It’s the workers who 
always pay for these crises,” said Raúl Lemos, 54, who manages a 
downtown paint store, as he clicked through an online price list showing 
that the price of some products had risen by 25 percent overnight. 
“Sales are going to drop.” Similarly, Sergio Camerucci, 52, who 
manufactures trophies and sells them to sports leagues, said the price 
of the plastic he needed to make the trophy bases rose by 20 percent 
after the devaluation.

Most economists expect the devaluation — and the accompanying raising of 
interest rates to anchor the peso — to result in anemic growth or a 
recession in 2016 before a rebound in 2017, with perhaps growth of 3.5 
percent, according to Sebastián Vargas and Pilar Tavella, Barclays 
economists in New York. This year, growth will be 0.4 percent, according 
to the International Monetary Fund; other economists predict it will be 
higher.

Supporters of Mr. Macri seem to understand this progression. “The last 
12 years were terrible,” Mr. Camerucci said of Mrs. Kirchner’s political 
movement, pointing to his falling sales over the last three years and 
the import restrictions, which made it difficult to buy the machinery he 
needed. “We have to be patient, but we are on a good path.”

Daniel Scatilazzi, 44, who was selling homemade pies and sandwiches from 
a stall, said he would suffer as prices jumped but understood Mr. 
Macri’s motives. “I’ll put up with it,” said Mr. Scatilazzi, a former 
supporter of Mrs. Kirchner who voted for Mr. Macri because he wanted 
change. “We have to give him time to work. Let’s see in six months if 
this bears any fruit.”

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to