> 2016/02/12 8:30、Louis Proyect <[email protected]> のメール： > > The superdelegates are not social workers and kindergarten teachers.
Indeed. In fact they are mostly elected officials who would have a real problem if the people who voted for Sanders by a huge margin decided to vote against them in local elections. I don't believe for a second that if the margins were clearly favoring Sanders they would move against him. But more to the point, because all this is just speculation anyway as wrote Carrol, what you have written in your post is *not* a demonstration that superdelegates would eventually vote against Sanders, but only that the Democrat establishment was able to keep the consensus in favor of Humphrey when the vote could easily be represented as favoring him. *If* Sanders goes on winning states the narrative is bound to change. It is gambling in its purest form, and superdelegates know that too. Jean-Christophe _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
