No.  That comment is far beneath you.  Take the time to read the Citizen United 
opinions.  The New York Times is a corporation.  Harvard University is a 
corporation.  If corporations do not have 1st Amendment rights, the government 
could censor those entities, notwithstanding the language of the 1st Amendment 
is not qualified.  Scalia’s concurrence addresses, and is in great part 
predicated upon, this issue, including an examination of the historical 
evidence of the common understanding of corporate speech in the 18th Century.

David Shemano

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of raghu
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:06 AM
To: Progressive Economics
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] "Scalia was an intellectual phony"

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Shemano, David B. wrote:
2.       Citizens United.  According to the logic that corporations do not have 
constitutional right,  the government could prohibit the New York Times from 
publishing articles criticizing public officials.  There is nothing in the text 
of the Constitution, including the 1st Amendment, that would support that view, 
and no contemporary jurist, even the most liberal, will go there.

If we don't accept money is speech, newspapers would cease to exist!
What a brilliant piece of legal reasoning!
-raghu.
____________________________________________________
 
Information contained in this e-mail transmission may be privileged, 
confidential and covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 
U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521.

If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute, or reproduce 
this transmission.

If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify us 
immediately of the error by return email and please delete the message from 
your system.

Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the U. S. Internal Revenue 
Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any 
attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of 
(i) avoiding penalties imposed under the U. S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) 
promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Robins Kaplan LLP
http://www.robinskaplan.com 
____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to