The branching of trees is ontogeny reiterating phylogeny.  A basic way to 
graphically portray evolution and phylogenic descent of life is as a _Tree_ of 
Life. ( ontogeny means the physical biography of an individual plant or animal 
). Famous biologist , Haekel once said " ontogeny reiterates phylogeny . " 
referring to the development of some animals in the womb going through forms 
like ancestral species; but I think Haekel was shown to be wrong on that  by 
Stephen Jay Gould. 
Of course , there is also branching in our circulatory system and nervous 
system.
Them human culture is based in kinship or Family _Trees_.

Phylogeny /taxonomy is very fundamental in biology. It also portrays Darwin's 
lesser known philosophical concept that _ all life is related through common 
ancestor species_ ; people have heard of natural selection , but fewer have 
heard of this full implication of descent with modification . The Tree of Life 
portrays both evolution and phylogeny ( relationships of species through 
closeness or distance from a common ancestor species); we think of a timeline 
running top to bottom of the Tree.

In other words , trees almost talk to us, teach us Darwinism through their 
bodies . Tree body language is an abstract portrayal of natural history . 

The original humans "listen ed" to the trees and organized human society 
phylogenetically , living people basing their relationships to each other based 
on relationships to common , _dead_ ancestors. "Ontogeny" or biographies of the 
living generations reiterating "phylogeny" of dead generations of our species.

This is natural, not religious, philosophy of Life, in several senses of Life. 
I ask my students the famous philo question "What is Life ? " with the 
suggestion that this is Life Science's answer. 





_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to