The permanent revolution today is reform struggles against the general , 
secular , day to day aggravations of the 99 % by capitalist society and 
economy, blues due to Bourgeois rule.


"Permanent revolution' according to Marx and Engels

Marx first used the phrase in the following passage from The Holy Family 
(1844). He wrote:

Napoleon presented the last battle of revolutionary terror against the 
bourgeois society which had been proclaimed by this same Revolution, and 
against its policy. Napoleon, of course, already discerned the essence of the 
modern state; he understood that it is based on the unhampered development of 
bourgeois society, on the free movement of private interest, etc. He decided to 
recognise and protect this basis. He was no terrorist with his head in the 
clouds. Yet at the same time he still regarded the state as an end in itself 
and civil life only as a treasurer and his subordinate which must have no will 
of its own. He perfected the terror by substituting permanent war for permanent 
revolution [emphasis added]. He fed the egoism of the French nation to complete 
satiety but demanded also the sacrifice of bourgeois business, enjoyments, 
wealth, etc., whenever this was required by the political aim of conquest. If 
he despotically suppressed the liberalism of bourgeois society — the political 
idealism of its daily practice — he showed no more consideration for its 
essential material interests, trade and industry, whenever they conflicted with 
his political interests. His scorn of industrial hommes d'affaires was the 
complement to his scorn of ideologists. In his home policy, too, he combated 
bourgeois society as the opponent of the state which in his own person he still 
held to be an absolute aim in itself. Thus he declared in the State Council 
that he would not suffer the owner of extensive estates to cultivate them or 
not as he pleased. Thus, too, he conceived the plan of subordinating trade to 
the state by appropriation of roulage [road haulage]. French businessmen took 
steps to anticipate the event that first shook Napoleon’s power. Paris 
exchange-brokers forced him by means of an artificially created famine to delay 
the opening of the Russian campaign by nearly two months and thus to launch it 
too late in the year.[1]
In this passage, Marx says that Napoleon prevented the 'bourgeois revolution' 
in France from becoming fulfilled: that is, he prevented bourgeois political 
forces from achieving a total expression of their interests. According to Marx, 
he did this by suppressing the 'liberalism of bourgeois society'; and he did it 
because he saw 'the state as an end in itself', a value which supported his 
'political aim of conquest'. Thus, he substituted 'permanent war for permanent 
revolution'. The final two sentences, however, show that the bourgeoisie did 
not give up hope, but continued to pursue their interests. This tells us that, 
for Marx, 'permanent revolution' involves a revolutionary class (in this case, 
the bourgeoisie) continuing to push for, and achieve, its interests despite the 
political dominance of actors with opposing interests.
P

Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to